From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: POM Xtables???
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:46:15 +0200
Message-ID: <4869FCE7.9000404@trash.net>
References: <935fab200806271054oa7c340evbf465b7a9984498b@mail.gmail.com>  <alpine.LNX.1.10.0806272003170.12725@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>  <4866F152.7030109@riverviewtech.net> <935fab200806300904rc7dc7b2kf58ab7893c3ef20a@mail.gmail.com> <486907EA.60105@trash.net> <alpine.LNX.1.10.0806302218500.30639@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr> <48694787.3080906@trash.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807011135120.30394@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807011135120.30394@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>, Dave <finalglide@gmail.com>, netfilter@vger.kernel.org

Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>> - LOGMARK - haven't seen it or can't remember
> 
> It adds the possibility to log the mark values of the packet/corresponding 
> conntrack entry via syslog. 
> 
> The feature should simply be added to the LOG target, there's no real 
> point to keep a separated target, as far as I see.

I agree. In fact I already added this to ipt_LOG/ip6t_LOG in
2.6.26-rc :)