From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Taylor Subject: Re: NAT rule Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:31:31 -0500 Message-ID: <487E4C93.9080502@riverviewtech.net> References: <487E4A67.70400@hoecoop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <487E4A67.70400@hoecoop.org> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Mail List - Netfilter On 07/16/08 14:22, Michael Crider wrote: > Thank you, Jan, for taking the time to come up with rules that would do > exactly what I was asking. Thank you, Grant, for thinking outside the > box. I implemented your suggestion and it works perfectly. You are welcome. I'm glad that things are working the way they need to. And as an added benefit with the second network, you don't have to worry about keeping them from connecting to other hosts. Of course depending on what access they have to the target system they can still bounce elsewhere. :s But with a VPN, they are just about in any way. Grant. . . .