Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michele Petrazzo - Unipex srl <michele.petrazzo@unipex.it>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: More ethernet port same ip address
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:11:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4884D160.7060701@unipex.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48819901.6030604@unipex.it>

Hi another time,

made some tries and I see that it works well with the "bridge" mode. The
only thing that I do was to to create a new bridge, remove the ip address
from the interfaces, add them to the bridge and set an ip address for
the bridge. Nothing other. With arp_proxy 1 or 0 it works in the same
manner.

The strange it's that I already tried this solution in test room, but I
remember that it didn't work. One think that forgot to say it's that
when I tried, I was using a different switch configuration (that now I
cannot reproduce): there was two different switch (with stp enabled and
configured), each one with 3 different vlan and each of the three vlans
end into one server ethernet port.
So:

pc1 <--> | vlan5 ------------- stp| <->  |stp ----------- stp| vlan 5<-> 
srv port 1
pc2 <--> | vlan6 -switch1-  stp| <-> |stp switch2 stp| vlan 6<-> srv port 2
pc3 <--> | vlan7 ------------- stp| <->  |stp ----------- stp| vlan 7<-> 
srv port 3

Here, for make the communication working, I have to setup the three
vlan(s) on the server port's, but they must have the same address.
And, with the "bridge" solution I think that I cannot.

Thanks to all,
Michele

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-21 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-19  7:34 More ethernet port same ip address Michele Petrazzo - Unipex srl
2008-07-19  8:18 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-07-19 13:46   ` Michele Petrazzo - Unipex srl
2008-07-19 14:01 ` Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
2008-07-19 14:13   ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-19 15:14     ` Michele Petrazzo - Unipex srl
2008-07-19 15:42       ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-19 16:05         ` Michele Petrazzo - Unipex srl
2008-07-19 16:13           ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-19 16:17         ` Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
2008-07-19 16:34           ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-19 16:45             ` Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
2008-07-19 15:11   ` Michele Petrazzo - Unipex srl
2008-07-20 23:41 ` Grant Taylor
2008-07-21  7:00   ` Anatoly Muliarski
2008-07-21 14:08     ` Grant Taylor
2008-07-21 18:11 ` Michele Petrazzo - Unipex srl [this message]
2008-07-21 19:46   ` Grant Taylor
2008-07-22 13:03   ` Anatoly Muliarski
2008-07-22 15:06     ` Grant Taylor
2008-07-22 15:20       ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4884D160.7060701@unipex.it \
    --to=michele.petrazzo@unipex.it \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox