From: Michele Petrazzo - Unipex srl <michele.petrazzo@unipex.it>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: More ethernet port same ip address
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:11:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4884D160.7060701@unipex.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48819901.6030604@unipex.it>
Hi another time,
made some tries and I see that it works well with the "bridge" mode. The
only thing that I do was to to create a new bridge, remove the ip address
from the interfaces, add them to the bridge and set an ip address for
the bridge. Nothing other. With arp_proxy 1 or 0 it works in the same
manner.
The strange it's that I already tried this solution in test room, but I
remember that it didn't work. One think that forgot to say it's that
when I tried, I was using a different switch configuration (that now I
cannot reproduce): there was two different switch (with stp enabled and
configured), each one with 3 different vlan and each of the three vlans
end into one server ethernet port.
So:
pc1 <--> | vlan5 ------------- stp| <-> |stp ----------- stp| vlan 5<->
srv port 1
pc2 <--> | vlan6 -switch1- stp| <-> |stp switch2 stp| vlan 6<-> srv port 2
pc3 <--> | vlan7 ------------- stp| <-> |stp ----------- stp| vlan 7<->
srv port 3
Here, for make the communication working, I have to setup the three
vlan(s) on the server port's, but they must have the same address.
And, with the "bridge" solution I think that I cannot.
Thanks to all,
Michele
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-21 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-19 7:34 More ethernet port same ip address Michele Petrazzo - Unipex srl
2008-07-19 8:18 ` Bernhard Bock
2008-07-19 13:46 ` Michele Petrazzo - Unipex srl
2008-07-19 14:01 ` Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
2008-07-19 14:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-19 15:14 ` Michele Petrazzo - Unipex srl
2008-07-19 15:42 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-19 16:05 ` Michele Petrazzo - Unipex srl
2008-07-19 16:13 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-19 16:17 ` Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
2008-07-19 16:34 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-07-19 16:45 ` Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães
2008-07-19 15:11 ` Michele Petrazzo - Unipex srl
2008-07-20 23:41 ` Grant Taylor
2008-07-21 7:00 ` Anatoly Muliarski
2008-07-21 14:08 ` Grant Taylor
2008-07-21 18:11 ` Michele Petrazzo - Unipex srl [this message]
2008-07-21 19:46 ` Grant Taylor
2008-07-22 13:03 ` Anatoly Muliarski
2008-07-22 15:06 ` Grant Taylor
2008-07-22 15:20 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4884D160.7060701@unipex.it \
--to=michele.petrazzo@unipex.it \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox