Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Mearns <mearns.b@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Schulman <andrex@alumni.utexas.net>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is p-o-m still the correct thing to use?
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 06:25:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <488EF032.5020000@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s7sl841gefisi4k0lreotlvqbmq9kfl99u@4ax.com>

Thanks a lot for the help, Andrew. The iptables source I have doesn't 
have a configure script...oh, but it does have an autogen script. I 
guess I was probably supposed to use that first. But it's a moot point, 
apparently, because of xtables, so I will be switching to that.

Thanks,
-Brian

Andrew Schulman wrote:
>> The latest version of POM seems to be from 2004, and I saw some 
>> references in the mailing list archive seeming to indicate that is' 
>> being deprecated, but is there anything to replace it?
> 
> For POM-ng, if you look in the snapshot directory of the FTP server, you'll find
> daily versions up to yesterday.  However, I recently tried to use on of those to
> install the condition patch, and it failed for reasons that I wasn't able to
> figure out in 30 mins. or so of research.
> 
> POM has now been superseded by xtables-addons
> (http://jengelh.medozas.de/projects/xtables/).  Unfortunately the netfilter site
> hasn't been updated yet to reflect this.  Discussion threads on that in this
> forum within the last week:
> 
>   POM Xtables???
>   patch-0-matic problems..?
> 
> At first I was annoyed at yet another big change in netfilter patching, but
> xtables-addons is better because it doesn't require you to patch either your
> kernel or iptables.
> 
>> I'd really like to patch in TARPITs, but the latest POM does not work 
>> with the latest iptable src ("doesn't look like a iptables source code 
>> directory to me.")
> 
> You have to run ./configure in your iptables source dir first.  Not sure if that
> used to be the case-- I think it wasn't.
> 
> That gets to wny I always used to hate using POM.  It was unique and volatile--
> about once a year someone would change something and my script would break and
> I'd have to go back and figure it all out again.  Good riddance, I say.
> 
> Good luck,
> Andrew.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-29 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-26  1:25 Is p-o-m still the correct thing to use? Brian Mearns
2008-07-26  9:52 ` Andrew Schulman
2008-07-29 10:25   ` Brian Mearns [this message]
2008-08-05 19:50     ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-08-29  0:37       ` Brian Mearns
2008-08-29 11:53         ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-08-29 12:28           ` Brian Mearns
     [not found]         ` <37034.89.107.243.1.1219995640.squirrel@www.arcoscom.com>
     [not found]           ` <48B7CF95.2080900@gmail.com>
2008-08-29 12:23             ` Brian Mearns

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=488EF032.5020000@gmail.com \
    --to=mearns.b@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrex@alumni.utexas.net \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox