From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Gilad Benjamini" Subject: RE: Ping in ESTABLISHED Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 08:42:43 -0800 Message-ID: <493bfd11.1c078e0a.5f04.61d5@mx.google.com> References: <493ac3bf.14098e0a.4085.ffffcfe1@mx.google.com> <200812071156.24909.christoph.paasch@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language :message-id; bh=zVQGURCZYwRzId9SLGLBTaGRLiAqxqMLs2sVPJe74cs=; b=EJoymTdEpxTrAd09x393AoOWSq2uuuraLPaQrepcMuDe1qE9jWJRyecMrfy1rP34XT vTqupgmvHLRZ+IyvRDvJnUPp8z1ajP6FJCNPaf4U7doeVI43EFozSWobT7i7wWiWzml6 2b2BPy+Ogs/lSQab1VV9/SOJeU0ri/gRdatik= In-Reply-To: <200812071156.24909.christoph.paasch@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-us Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: 'Christoph Paasch' , netfilter@vger.kernel.org So you are saying that once a single ECHO REPLY does not arrive, the connection will go into ESTABLISHED and all further pings, request or reply, will be considered part of this connection ? Seems to match my scenario. Can you point me to the relevant places in the code ? Thx > -----Original Message----- > From: Christoph Paasch [mailto:christoph.paasch@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 2:56 AM > To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Gilad Benjamini > Subject: Re: Ping in ESTABLISHED > > Hi, > > does your machine on the eth2 network always waits for the reply of the > ping, > before sending the next one? > > After seeing the ECHO-REPLY passing, the connection tracker tries to > delete > the created connection, if all the ECHO-REQUESTS have been answered. As > it may > be possible, that there are several ECHO-REQUESTS passing before the > ECHO- > REPLY deletes the connection, netfilter will put the state of the > connection as > ESTABLISHED. And that's the reason, why you don't have any NEW > connections > anymore. This behaviour may be due to the fact that some ECHO-REPLY's > are lost > on their way, and a new ECHO-REQUEST was send, before the connection > timed out > in the connection tracker. > > > I hope, I was clear, and that it was correct what I told. > > Have a nice day. > > Christoph > > 2008-12-06, "Gilad Benjamini" : > > I have a situation where a continuous ping, expected to create a new > > connection each time, turns into a single connection in ESTABLISHED > state > > > > Here are the details: > > - iptables runs on a bridge > > - The bridge connects eth1 and eth2 > > - The iptables rules (minimized for the sake of this post) > > -A FORWARD -p icmp -m physdev --physdev-in eth1 --physdev-is- > bridged > > -j ACCEPT > > -A FORWARD -p icmp -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT > > -A FORWARD -p icmp -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT > > -A FORWARD -j ACCEPT > > - A machine located on the eth2 network constantly sends a ping to a > > machine located in eth1 network > > - "iptables -L -v" shows the counters growing on rules #1 and #3. > This is > > expected. > > - However, at some point, the counters start increasing on rule #2, > and > > stop increasing on rule #3. This can happen after 200 pings, 400, or > even > > 3000 in one overnight test. > > > > Any idea what's going on ? > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter" > in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > -- > Christoph Paasch > > www.rollerbulls.be > --