Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: can't port forward on multihome
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 12:24:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4958B367.8060308@plouf.fr.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gj8reg$bq3$1@ger.gmane.org>

sean darcy a écrit :
> sean darcy wrote:
>> Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>>>
>>> As you used DNAT, you may use the --ctorigdst option of the 
>>> 'conntrack' match and mark reply packets based on the original 
>>> destination address of the connection.
>>>
>>> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 \
>>>   -m connmark --ctorigdst $ETH0_IP_ADDR -j MARK --set-mark 0x1
>>> ip rule add fwmark 0x1 table 128 prio 127
[...]
>> As you can see ctorigdst didn't work with iptables in fedora 9:
>>
>> iptables v1.4.1.1: Unknown arg `--ctorigdst`

My mistake, I meant "-m conntrack", not "-m connmark".

>> Also, I see you set the new ip rule with priority 127. Am I right that 
>> higher priority numbers override lower priority number in case of a 
>> conflict? Or does it determine the order in which rules are applied, 
>> smaller numbers first?

Rules with a lower priority number are examined first. I set a different 
priority because I thought there could be only one rule per priority, 
but I was wrong. However I don't know in which order rules with the same 
priority are examined, so setting different priorities may be safer if 
the rule ordering matters.

> ## this should make all packets from the * server go out over broadview
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 \
>    -s 10.10.10.180 -j MARK --set-mark 0x1
> ip rule add fwmark 0x1 table 128 prio 127
> 
> adding this work fine I can ssh and make voip connections to the voip 
> server.
> 
> But if add this, I can no longer make a voip connection to the voip server.
> 
> ## this is supposed to make all packets replying to eth0
> ## go out eth0
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -m state --state NEW \
>     -j CONNMARK --set-mark 0x1
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -j CONNMARK --restore-mark

Which VoIP protocol are you using ? If it is SIP or H.323, are the 
corresponding conntrack and NAT helper modules loaded ? I believe they 
are required so that the connection tracking can set the connection mark 
to the related voice traffic.

      reply	other threads:[~2008-12-29 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-19 20:38 can't port forward on multihome sean darcy
2008-12-20 11:06 ` Pascal Hambourg
2008-12-28 20:53   ` sean darcy
2008-12-28 21:35     ` sean darcy
2008-12-29 11:24       ` Pascal Hambourg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4958B367.8060308@plouf.fr.eu.org \
    --to=pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox