Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabio Marcone <fabio.marcone@duet.it>
To: Michele Petrazzo - Unipex <michele.petrazzo@unipex.it>,
	netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tc and CONNMARK
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:38:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ACA04DF.3030006@duet.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AC9FF4E.5010307@unipex.it>

Thanks for your reply,

> A first idea, without saw your rules, it's that you limit the wrong side
> of communication, however no one can help you without understand better
> your environment.
it's not possible because if I test only download flow or upload flow, 
limit rate is ok.

> Post your tc/iptables rules and commands.

I'm developing a firewall/router with some services and configuration 
it's not so easy to understand.

>
> P.s. Use two different mark for different update/download traffic
I'm using connmark so both flow of connection are marked with same mark 
(CONNMARK) but shaper rule are set on different interfaces:
mark 10 on eth0 -> classid 1:6
mark 10 on eth1 -> classid 2:6

where classes are build with these commands:
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:6 htb rate 600kbit ceil 
600kbit burst 6k cburst 64k quantum 1600
tc class add dev eth0 parent 2:1 classid 2:6 htb rate 600kbit ceil 
600kbit burst 6k cburst 64k quantum 1600

and filters are:
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip handle 10 fw flowid 1:6
tc filter add dev eth1 parent 2: protocol ip handle 10 fw flowid 2:6

do you think is a connmark problem?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-05 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-05  9:32 tc and CONNMARK Fabio Marcone
     [not found] ` <4AC9FF4E.5010307@unipex.it>
2009-10-05 14:38   ` Fabio Marcone [this message]
2009-10-05 16:22     ` Michele Petrazzo - Unipex
2009-10-06 11:53       ` Fabio Marcone
     [not found]         ` <56378e320910060516x596cf5abv20e916ae9f694e6d@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-06 12:21           ` Richard Horton
2009-10-06 13:08         ` Michele Petrazzo - Unipex
2009-10-06 13:32           ` Fabio Marcone
2009-10-07 11:41 ` tc and CONNMARK [SOLVED] Fabio Marcone

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ACA04DF.3030006@duet.it \
    --to=fabio.marcone@duet.it \
    --cc=michele.petrazzo@unipex.it \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox