Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mart Frauenlob <mart.frauenlob@chello.at>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Disabling conntrack for local net
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:09:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE13AA6.5080509@chello.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <034DEBCAE934A74991E6E76B8DA72D14185DD509DA@HSSBS.holdstead.local>

Gary Smith wrote:
> We have several IP's NAT'd in from public interface.  Even with that we noticed that 80% or so of the connection entries appear to be local to local traffic.
>
> We have the following subnets
>
> 10.40.16.0/24 (NAT'd public)
> 10.40.17.0/24 (internal data)
> 10.40.18.0/24 (internal data)
> 10.40.19.0/24 (internal data)
> 10.40.20.0/24 (NAT'd public)
>
> Public internface NAT's mostly to 10.40.16.0/24 IP's, and a couple on the 10.40.20.0/24 IP's.  We have data/internal services on the 10.40.17.0/24 and 10.40.18.0/24.  We see lots of connections from the 10.40.16.0/24 to the data/internal getting entered into the conntrack (as you would normally expect).  
>
> So, is there any benefit of not conntracking these?  Is so, how do I do that without breaking the NAT.
>
> I know I did this years ago, I just can't remember how.
>   

Benefit = No resources used on connection tracking

-t raw -m -s x.x.x.x/zz -d y.y.y.y/zz -j NOTRACK

Regards

Mart

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-23  5:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-23  3:00 Disabling conntrack for local net Gary Smith
2009-10-23  5:09 ` Mart Frauenlob [this message]
2009-10-23  6:22   ` Mart Frauenlob
2009-10-23 16:26     ` Gary Smith
2009-11-16 23:32       ` Gary Smith
2009-11-17 10:03         ` Mart Frauenlob
2009-11-17 16:35           ` Gary Smith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AE13AA6.5080509@chello.at \
    --to=mart.frauenlob@chello.at \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox