From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michele Petrazzo - Unipex Subject: Re: Best Kernel QoS Parameters Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:53:30 +0200 Message-ID: <4AE1B55A.30802@unipex.it> References: <4AD48D3F.6000502@ampernet.com.br> <4AD858F4.4050709@unipex.it> <4AD86551.4050201@ampernet.com.br> <4AD86F4E.90301@unipex.it> <4AD87460.2010201@ampernet.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4AD87460.2010201@ampernet.com.br> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Lucas Willian Bocchi Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org Lucas Willian Bocchi ha scritto: (sorry for late reply, I was so busy) > > The documentation, really, is very poor in this question. > well said! > Now, about the hardware: I have, for example: ~#~ ethtool -g eth0 > Ring parameters for eth0: Pre-set maximums: RX: 4096 RX > Mini: 0 RX Jumbo: 0 TX: 4096 Current > hardware settings: RX: 256 RX Mini: 0 RX Jumbo: 0 > TX: 80 > I have the same data here, more or less > My preocupation is: the Shaper (htb, hfsc, etc) use this parameters > in your configuration? I don't know if directly the shaper or the kernel take advantage of them, but I can say that I tried to use a low card and the result was so...miserable. Of course with the same programming. > The programmers have in mind that this buffer can affect the > eficiency of shaper? I think that the best ml for ask this is directly to lkml.org. > To me, it's very important the precision, because I have clients with > 1 or more MB of link and 56, 48 kbps clients too, and I need to have > these in mind. > Sorry, but have you already tried a setup like that? Before starts I try here, in office, my server and after seen that worked perfect with about ten clients, I put it in production and now it's shaping perfectly about 1k htb classes! Michele