netfilter.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mart Frauenlob <mart.frauenlob@chello.at>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: intrapositioned  and extrapositioned negation
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:04:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE95AA2.4000601@chello.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ADD982F.209@chello.at>

Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> Hello,
>
> today I installed iptables 1.4.5 and discovered my ruleset produces 
> those warnings about intrapositioned  negation:
> Using intrapositioned negation (`--option ! this`) is deprecated in 
> favor of extrapositioned (`! --option this`).
>
> I haven't completely looked up the changelogs, but from what I've 
> found on the internet, this was introduced with 1.4.3.1, right?
>
> However, my ruleset is automatically generated by a self written shell 
> script, which I now need to change.
> It needs to work with any 2.6 kernel and with 2.4 kernels supporting 
> iptables.
> As my testing options (hardware, time) are limited, I'm asking if 
> someone knows:
>
> Will 2.4 kernels and older iptables versions accept the 
> extrapositioned (`! --option this`) notation?
> If so, I can rewrite my script to always use extrapositioned syntax. 
> Lot's of work, but ok...
>
> If not, what kernel / iptables versions do only understand the old 
> deprecated way?
> So I can query for them and take the appropriate steps.
>
> Thanks a lot!


Nobody knows?
Well, I've found some old virtual machines, tested it with debian woody 
and sarge, using kernel 2.4.18.bf2-4 and 2.6.18 and extrapositioned 
negation does not seem to cause problems.
Am I right to assume, that all 2.4 kernels with iptables support - DON'T 
have troubles using extrapositioned negation???

Regards

Mart

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-29  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-20 10:59 intrapositioned and extrapositioned negation Mart Frauenlob
2009-10-29  9:04 ` Mart Frauenlob [this message]
2009-10-30  9:56   ` Patrick McHardy
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-10-30 14:48 Mart Frauenlob

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AE95AA2.4000601@chello.at \
    --to=mart.frauenlob@chello.at \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).