netfilter.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Ralph de Boom <lkml@deboom.biz>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Iptables v1.4.4 + kernel 2.6.31 mangle marking changed?
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:16:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AF1628D.5080401@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF0CF8C.7000602@deboom.biz>

Ralph de Boom wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> Excuse me if this email might go wrong, it's my first message to a
> mailing list.
> 
> But here's my problem: (And I hope you guys could shed light for me...)
> 
> I originally ran Debian Lenny on kernel 2.6.18.
> Since today I reinstalled it to Ubuntu Server 9.10 with kernel  2.6.31.
> 
> Now I used to do this in lenny:
> 
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 81.4.97.0/24 -j
> MARK --set-mark 0x1
> 
> This would cause relevant packets to be marked 0x1, which in return I
> had a 'ip rule':
> 
> my rules look like this:
> 
> ip rule show
> 0:      from all lookup local
> 32760:  from all fwmark 0x2 lookup upc
> 32761:  from all fwmark 0x1 lookup xs4all
> 32762:  from 192.168.1.XX lookup xs4all
> 32763:  from 192.168.1.XX lookup upc
> 32764:  from 24.132.104.XXX lookup upc
> 32765:  from 192.168.2.XX lookup xs4all
> 32766:  from all lookup main
> 32767:  from all lookup default
> 
> And my 'xs4all' table looks like:
> 
> ip route show table xs4all
> 192.168.2.0/24 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.2.XX
> default via 192.168.2.X dev eth0
> 
> 
> I know the rule matches packets i make:
> 
> iptables -t mangle -v -L
> Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 3111K packets, 1861M bytes)
> pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source              
> destination
>   16  1100 MARK       all  --  any    any     192.168.1.0/24      
> ip-space.by.proserve.nl/24 MARK xset 0x1/0xffffffff
> 
> But somehow the connection is never relayed over the xs4all table...
> 
> The changes I've noticed compared to lenny:
> 
> iptables now likes to mark my --set-mark 0x1 as a --set-xmark
> 0x1/0xffffffff
> whereas in lenny it would stay a --set-mark 0x1
> 
> Would be very pleased if someone could help me in this matter.

Please try adding a LOG rule directly after the marking rule and
see what it prints out for the MARK= value.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-04 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-04  0:49 Iptables v1.4.4 + kernel 2.6.31 mangle marking changed? Ralph de Boom
2009-11-04 11:16 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-11-04 13:15   ` Ralph de Boom
2009-11-04 14:10     ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-04 15:53       ` Ralph de Boom
2009-11-05 11:52         ` Richard Horton
2009-11-05 17:53           ` Ralph de Boom
2009-11-10 17:34             ` Ralph de Boom
2009-11-11  8:33               ` Richard Horton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AF1628D.5080401@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=lkml@deboom.biz \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).