From: "U. George" <netbeans@gatworks.com>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Is there some reason why IPSET kernel modules are not in kernel source?
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:25:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B857D3F.6070901@gatworks.com> (raw)
Seems like iptable modules are included in kernel source.
Not so with the IPSET modules. Is this something political?
next reply other threads:[~2010-02-24 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-24 19:25 U. George [this message]
2010-02-24 21:40 ` Is there some reason why IPSET kernel modules are not in kernel source? Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-02-25 17:37 ` U. George
2010-02-28 6:37 ` /dev/rob0
2010-02-28 13:26 ` U. George
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B857D3F.6070901@gatworks.com \
--to=netbeans@gatworks.com \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).