From: Mart Frauenlob <mart.frauenlob@chello.at>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: multiport needs `-p tcp', `-p udp' - Why?
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 07:38:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B8A0F5A.7060903@chello.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cfeab66d1002272046o320823b3t49f90044da1253ce@mail.gmail.com>
On 28.02.2010 05:47, netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org wrote:
> George ,
>
> for -p option , we can specify icmp ( layer 3 protocol )
> or other layer 4 protocol other than UDP and TCP .
>
> I could be wrong . I am also a beginner .
>
> Thanks,
> Ratheesh.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 2:44 AM, U. George <netbeans@gatworks.com> wrote:
>> It makes no diff to either udp or tcp - port address are at the same header
>> offset. It does makes a difference if you want to test both in the rule. I
>> only want to test ports with this rule.
>>
>> On 02/27/2010 03:46 PM, richard.horton@solstans.co.uk wrote:
>> And as each rule is distinct the line with multiport does not know you have
>> already determined the protocol...
>> Ahhh, *But I know*. I designed the filter that way. If u want to *warn* me,
>> then thats probably ok.
>> --
Could you guys please stop top posting.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-28 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4b8984a7.0ab6660a.24bd.1f7f@mx.google.com>
2010-02-27 21:14 ` multiport needs `-p tcp', `-p udp' - Why? U. George
2010-02-28 4:46 ` ratheesh k
2010-02-28 6:38 ` Mart Frauenlob [this message]
2010-02-27 15:03 U. George
2010-02-27 15:06 ` ratheesh k
2010-02-27 16:17 ` U. George
2010-02-27 16:46 ` ratheesh k
2010-02-27 17:28 ` U. George
2010-02-27 17:18 ` Dennis J.
2010-02-28 6:54 ` Mart Frauenlob
2010-02-28 10:53 ` ratheesh k
2010-02-28 13:59 ` U. George
2010-02-28 14:41 ` Mart Frauenlob
2010-02-28 15:17 ` U. George
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B8A0F5A.7060903@chello.at \
--to=mart.frauenlob@chello.at \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox