From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How does netfilter decide which in/out-interface a packet has
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:09:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B8E97BA.9070103@plouf.fr.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100303165422.18973x8p8ccy6s84@webmail.physik.uni-muenchen.de>
Hello,
Christoph Anton Mitterer a écrit :
>
> How does netfilter decide which in/out-interface a packet has?
It doesn't. The packet decides which input interface is arrives on, and
the routing decision decides which output interface it leaves.
> I mean the following:
> Image I have a host with the following interfaces and addresses:
> lo: 127.x.x.x and :1/128
> eth0: 88.88.88.88
> 99.99.99.99 is a remote address (packets come in via eth0)
>
> Now consider the following cases (source --> destination):
> "internal traffic":
> 127.x.x.x --> 127.x.x.x => quite clear, in=lo out=lo
> 127.x.x.x --> 88.88.88.88 => in=??? out=???
> 88.88.88.88 --> 88.88.88.88 => in=??? out=???
> 88.88.88.88 --> 127.x.x.x => in=??? out=???
lo in all cases.
> "incoming traffic (from remote):
> 99.99.99.99 --> 127.x.x.x => is that possible at all? how would
> the in=/out= be?
eth0, but the packet is discarded after PREROUTING by the input routing
decision which prohibits receiving a packet with a loopback address from
outside (a non loopback interface).
> 99.99.99.99 --> 88.88.88.88 => quite clear, in=eth0 out=n/a
Yup.
> "outgoing traffic (to remote):
> 127.x.x.x --> 99.99.99.99 => is that possible at all?
Not possible, the output routing decision prohibits sending a packet
with a loopback address outside the host (on a non loopback interface).
> 88.88.88.88 --> 99.99.99.99 => quite clear, in=n/a out=eth0
Yup.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-03 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-03 15:54 How does netfilter decide which in/out-interface a packet has Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-03-03 17:09 ` Pascal Hambourg [this message]
2010-03-04 10:28 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-03-04 22:59 ` Pascal Hambourg
2010-03-07 3:14 ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2010-03-07 12:45 ` Pascal Hambourg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B8E97BA.9070103@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--to=pascal.mail@plouf.fr.eu.org \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox