From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: Richard Feng <rfeng@wurldtech.com>,
"netfilter@vger.kernel.org" <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: conntrack-tools 0.9.14 can not block the connection
Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 21:13:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE46649.1040703@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1005071823100.23210@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Friday 2010-05-07 18:17, Richard Feng wrote:
>
>>> >From the documentation (from conntrack-tools.netfilter.org),
>>>> somewhere it says that "have to set
>>>> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_tcp_be_liberal to
>>>> zero".There is simply no 'netfilter' folder under my folder
>>>> '/proc/sys/net/ipv4'. Is this the problem? How could I fix it?
>
>> So 'conntrack -D' can not really cut current connections? It can
>> only delete entry from the state table? I just want to make sure -
>>from the document
>> "http://conntrack-tools.netfilter.org/manual.html#conntrack". It
>> clearly said "Delete on entry, this can be used to block traffic
>> (you have to set
>> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_tcp_be_liberal to zero)".
>
> The documentation seems to be off here. If you only delete a ct
> entry, the next packet (even if a TCP ACK or something) will make
> a new ct with NEW as a ctstate.
>
> To really have a TCP/SCTP connection blocked after deletion of the ct
> entry, you have to only allow NEW ctstates with the initla TCP/SCTP
> packet (SYN/INIT).
Yes, you need a well-formed stateful rule-set "to cut" the connection
(at least you have to add a rule to block traffic in INVALID stats).
Probably this is not clear enough in the doc. I can write a patch for
this or alternatively accept one.
Thank you for the comments.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-07 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-06 23:51 conntrack-tools 0.9.14 can not block the connection Richard Feng
2010-05-07 7:55 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-05-07 8:49 ` Rob Sterenborg
2010-05-07 9:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-05-07 16:17 ` Richard Feng
2010-05-07 16:27 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-05-07 19:13 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2010-05-07 19:14 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-05-07 19:46 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-05-07 20:13 ` Pascal Hambourg
2010-05-08 20:33 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2010-05-08 20:39 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-05-10 11:11 ` Pascal Hambourg
2010-05-09 23:16 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-05-07 9:57 ` Pascal Hambourg
2010-05-07 16:22 ` Richard Feng
2010-05-07 18:51 ` Pascal Hambourg
2010-05-07 19:04 ` Richard Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE46649.1040703@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rfeng@wurldtech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).