Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adam Gundy <arg@cyberscience.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: conntrackd not replicating NATted FTP connection properly?
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:10:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C3C9E1D.50905@cyberscience.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C3C4275.2060108@netfilter.org>

Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On 12/07/10 16:40, Adam Gundy wrote:
>> I've set up a pair of redundant routers using keepalived and conntrackd.
>> Part of their job is to handle routing to an FTP server in a NATted DMZ.
>>
>> both servers are running Ubuntu Lucid, but for other reasons I've switched
>> to a stock 2.6.33.5 kernel. I've also tried building the 0.9.14 version of
>> conntrack to see if it fixed the problem (lucid ships with 0.9.13).
>>
>> this works great, except that an existing FTP connection gets 'broken' when
>> the master flips to the other machine. the data connection is fine, but the
>> control connection seems to have broken sequence numbers - the leading four
>> (or eight) bytes in the next packet sent is ignored. (example packet trace
>> available off list).
>>
>> looking at the conntrack source code, it seems to suggest that the NAT
>> 'sequence offset' should be replicated... but it clearly isn't being?
>>
>> am I supposed to match a particular version of conntrackd to the kernel?
>>
>> is NATted FTP not supported by conntrackd?
> 
> Yes, it should work but some bugs were in the middle of the road. You'll
> need these two patches for the conntrack-tools and the library
> libnetfilter_conntrack:
> 
> http://git.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=conntrack-tools.git;a=commit;h=1f3c6df4f8984fce347718cca09dd0e2fa138ce1
> 
> http://git.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=libnetfilter_conntrack.git;a=commit;h=e387e4f81f067cdaca4bb632d4028f794fc4c14b
> 
> I have tested this scenario with the following rule-set:
> 
> -A PREROUTING -d 192.168.1.100 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 9999 -j DNAT
> --to-destination 192.168.1.2:21
> 
> The module nf_nat_ftp is also required, of course. I was using a linux
> kernel 2.6.32.2 in my firewalls and snapshots of the current
> libnetfilter_conntrack and the conntrack-tools from git.netfilter.org
> 
> These patches will be included in the upcoming release of
> libnetfilter_conntrack and conntrack-tools 0.9.15 (to appear soon).
> 
> I'd appreciate if you can also test it in your firewall cluster and ACK
> this. Thanks for the bug reporting.

awesome! the current GIT version is working great now...

thanks for your rapid response. I'm looking forward to the 0.9.15 version!

      reply	other threads:[~2010-07-13 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-12 14:40 conntrackd not replicating NATted FTP connection properly? Adam Gundy
2010-07-13 10:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2010-07-13 17:10   ` Adam Gundy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4C3C9E1D.50905@cyberscience.com \
    --to=arg@cyberscience.com \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox