From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Chmielewski Subject: Re: using iptables with tun/tap interfaces? no rule sees tun/tap interface traffic Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:38:02 +0200 Message-ID: <4C7A54AA.5090909@wpkg.org> References: <4C7A3E75.5020202@wpkg.org> <20100829131559.23abd652@catus> <4C7A4972.4020304@wpkg.org> <20100829142146.5c8119ed@catus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=wpkg.org; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=8iXxHT8o3 uPW/I3SPzIV4+lsITg=; b=4ZcMLe6nCH8KfRvnVqp8UEwQRNBrDU2tzzWYfU6kj Zv+mhHWIA5S6LNjrsw0IZvHubHcVIBSyjwLNeOmSPoNZ6W4jLZPxM2sMp4Eu84EF zhPW8bwLQxsnKfaqtigDCOJgy440Ono2OgJ+wF89HOOqN5JHBIblX9zSPxTiieKh 6c= In-Reply-To: <20100829142146.5c8119ed@catus> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Marek Kierdelewicz Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org On 29.08.2010 14:21, Marek Kierdelewicz wrote: > Hi, > >> Using 2.6.35 kernel. >> Should I use ebtables for this? iptables seem more flexible here. > > Iptables should work great. Try matching interface with > physdev-in/physdev-out instead of -i/-o as described here: > http://bwachter.lart.info/linux/bridges.html It did the trick, thanks! -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org