From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mr Dash Four Subject: Re: decipher the secmark number from nf_conntrack/ip_conntrack Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:15:52 +0100 Message-ID: <4C97A4D8.4020505@googlemail.com> References: <4C9696E5.4030803@googlemail.com> <4C973A6A.9010809@googlemail.com> <4C9756AB.5040304@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id :disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Fgu0cnq4br89W9bQmOSol2hVRojUuKKSV7rRcxF6Rqg=; b=iYVppxqVtQah2UNWmxgVJQHEXM+3J2PA4aRJRLXZseGlueynaGuIrOLPwvPxC7QC5Z vbbVTbLVz+AcCpocwL7a9MMpfjj7I1LM6P3emewRC9uQtJoO0Y2VmiF21proTQirND9o SDPFm5c3PlGNeRh2cPL8nakiAAkWRtSH8ihTg= In-Reply-To: <4C9756AB.5040304@googlemail.com> Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org, Pablo Neira Ayuso , netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org Further to my earlier post today, I can now confirm that the number shown in the secmark=XXX output IS the same as the "selctx" field in xt_SECMARK.h/libxt_SECMARK.c so it won't be that difficult to extract and incorporate the whole struct in some way suitable for visualisation (here's hoping!).