From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mr Dash Four Subject: Re: ipporthash, ipportiphash, ipportnethash problems Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:54:36 +0100 Message-ID: <4CA79C0C.7080104@googlemail.com> References: <4CA5091B.1090200@googlemail.com> <4CA5C48E.9010603@googlemail.com> <4CA70B3B.90001@googlemail.com> <4CA79133.3070608@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id :disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mgC05rkVva25mc5MLaPcB1u51YJ7khg3szv63OMuVeU=; b=buibECrNZ1sD6AHsLyytM9LMxvk8Z2v50qWQ4oqBLkYiK29LjIy3y/ho02WcM359Uh 05LK76ob2KlJiHWytWxw7Rj4ui3o1cyDeANS+TP3ejOyxFm62HuXG+IjDFzVxkscL8hl +mhBG4SB4Ezn3U9RBPLPc/HMiVKio4MQMtBYs= In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik , netfilter@vger.kernel.org > Well give me a little leeway. It hasn't even been 24 hours since 4.4. > Well, I know you are busy working on the latest nf_conntrack patches so... (-; > What is sad too is that Fedora has had so far no interest (or perhaps > just no maintainer) to take it up into the distro. > I won't miss it that as much if I could prepare the rpms myself from source (via make with dist-rpm target for example) - I can live with that. >> Even if I solve problem No 2 (i.e. by tar-ing the necessary modules and >> executables) I can't see a way to get past compiling for a different >> architecture (and resolve all the dependencies)! Any ideas? >> > > You could use the openSUSE Build Service to produce packages for > various distributions (including Fedora) and the two archs. It should > be possible to include Fedora-specific blocks in the preexisting > xtables-addons.spec too. > I have a policy that I built all system-sensitive packages from source on one or two of my machines locally, so doing that externally isn't really an option for me. > But that should not really matter, because after a repo is done > building, you can use the regular system tools (zypper, yum) to > update, so that rpmbuild itself needs no network activity. > If I could compile and, at least, build the binaries in one single package (be it rpm, tar.gz or similar) so that they can be installed during my kickstart I would be happy with that. As a last option I could compile the source on i686 environment (for i686 machine to be installed on), but I definitely need a complete package (in rpm, tar.gz etc - as I already pointed out) so that I could transfer it for my kickstart to unpack and install when building the update image. That's my dilemma at present.