From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Haxby <john.haxby@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: VLANs
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 17:12:29 +0000
Message-ID: <4D2C8F7D.1080200@oracle.com>
References: <4D2B44E9.3000006@abpni.co.uk> <0903BC3C-68B9-4E15-BEE1-0A9F6CDCF226@oracle.com> <4D2B84F0.6030300@abpni.co.uk> <4D2C3426.3000202@oracle.com> <4D2C37A1.8090906@abpni.co.uk> <4D2C47DB.10702@oracle.com> <4D2C4C13.3020107@abpni.co.uk> <4D2C5193.6010703@oracle.com> <4D2C5285.9070108@abpni.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D2C5285.9070108@abpni.co.uk>
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@abpni.co.uk>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org

On 11/01/11 12:52, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> Yes I actually read that document. It's a very good document indeed, 
> however I took it "with a pince of salt" as it's also got marketing 
> behind it. 

The Cisco technical documentation is generally very good -- this one is 
no exception.  You can spot Cisco marketing documentation a mile off: it 
has no technical content :-)

jch