From: GMail Isaac Gonzalez <isaak.gonzalez@gmail.com>
To: Giles Coochey <giles@coochey.net>
Cc: "Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@medozas.de>,
"Gáspár Lajos" <swifty@freemail.hu>,
"netfilter list" <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: POSTROUTING SNAT only reply packets
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:57:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D342E99.2030501@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D342AF4.6070504@coochey.net>
El 17/01/11 12:41, Giles Coochey escribió:
> On 17/01/2011 12:36, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Monday 2011-01-17 11:55, Giles Coochey wrote:
>>>> You should do all of the NAT-ing ON THE LOAD BALANCER:
>>>>
>>> I have to agree - if you are doing NAT you want to avoid any type of
>>> asymmetric
>>> routing - especially you NEED to make sure that the device that is
>>> doing the
>>> NAT (be it for load balancing or other reasons) receives the return
>>> packets.
>> Not strictly. You could utilize a second device whose CTs are
>> synchronized
>> with the LB to apply the reverse transform, using conntrackd.
>> Sort of like
>>
>> digraph { internet -> lb; lb -> web; web -> unnat; unnat ->
>> internet; };
>>
>> but it only looks feasible to me if your LB is already computationally
>> crowded.
>> --
> It also requires the loadbalancer to be using netfilter as well.
>
> If it's a hardware load balancer with proprietary methods then you
> will need symmetric routing through it, unless it supports some form
> of TCP state sharing.
>
It works with propietary methods. The real solution if do symmetrical
routing, all the replies must pass through the LB. I can't use
conntrackd because I can't install anything in the LB.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-17 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-17 10:16 POSTROUTING SNAT only reply packets GMail Isaac Gonzalez
2011-01-17 10:38 ` Gáspár Lajos
2011-01-17 10:51 ` GMail Isaac Gonzalez
2011-01-17 11:14 ` Amos Jeffries
2011-01-17 10:55 ` Giles Coochey
2011-01-17 11:07 ` GMail Isaac Gonzalez
2011-01-17 11:36 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-01-17 11:41 ` Giles Coochey
2011-01-17 11:57 ` GMail Isaac Gonzalez [this message]
2011-01-17 12:10 ` Jan Engelhardt
2011-01-17 23:07 ` Michael Vallaly
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-17 10:15 Isaac González
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D342E99.2030501@gmail.com \
--to=isaak.gonzalez@gmail.com \
--cc=giles@coochey.net \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swifty@freemail.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox