From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mr Dash Four Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] ipset 6.5 released Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 12:03:11 +0100 Message-ID: <4DD255EF.1040209@googlemail.com> References: <4DD145C0.4060705@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date :from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VPKGrWlPRMEpjlvHLF7Qr98Z7PyEvlABOxLdXiW5XE8=; b=WNkUuzkVmrsjXVD/HlXE5FiqFV6YkDp0ddAV6oFh7gDFqfVcxVo2fWwhfSbBqwERfU Vll1zUw8YKw0wK4sDn2+UHpbhziplNSUcAE9jKLp37czPDCM545W7SqI1itGco++w+kK aSmKTLhcBKdA9qMRqkf6hKc8F7lM7FWzPS538= In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Jozsef Kadlecsik Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org >> That's great news! Should I assume that the (more-than-double) hash bug I >> reported a while ago has also been fixed? >> > > Yes, it was fixed, the last one ("Fix adding ranges to hash types") covers > that. > Thank you Jozsef. I have quickly tried the new version last night on a freshly compiled kernel (with ipset kernel modules included into the kernel - not as modules though) - the loading performance of "bulk" ranges is much, much better now, though I've got an error when trying to load a set which consisted of just 3 different subnet ranges (that set was using the "old" treemap syntax). When I have some more time - probably later this evening - I will post details of that error (I think it was to do with hashes again). Also, I don't know whether you will be interested in this, but when I modified ipset 4.5 in order to split the kernel modules from the userspace tool and include these in two separate building streams for my systems, I managed to change ipset 4.5 to enable the use of autogen/automake tools and then the execution of "./configure" as part of building that package. As part of that process I introduced 2 extra "parameters" to it - "--hash-size" and "--max-elements". I could send you this patch to "refresh" the ipset 4.5 version or just have a look at it, if you so desire - just let me know. ipset 4.5 has served me very well since I started using it and was a vital contributor to the improved stability and performance on all my systems.