From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mr Dash Four Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] ipset 6.5 released Date: Sun, 22 May 2011 15:52:44 +0100 Message-ID: <4DD9233C.70208@googlemail.com> References: <4DD145C0.4060705@googlemail.com> <4DD8158D.4040306@googlemail.com> <4DD83174.6070105@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:disposition-notification-to:date :from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q9hULRoicr+xKT2DVeTPRNF4X7a8F2jtz4cky1WiIpQ=; b=rl6W3CRWQ3my1atpG1zuXYJyzDbotQxRQBv50IiP5LpCMFESomSuhkUUoPtUO6Bkjk wSveI/5mz+O9YsPknsa7YMq/TVDztqBQcrs7DGUE9YQWvFTpe2fme6yg6KkhrCBZm7dP exq/pa1/q4tCP/pZ7AuyDSDH7EYs24xxbyPj8= In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Jozsef Kadlecsik Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org > Your first set named 'test_ips' consisting of 11670 ranges can only be > converted to 15613 networks, i.e. members. Not all ranges can be expressed > with a single network. > I have a suggestion then: Is it possible to include the number of members registered in the set in the set headers - something like "Members: xxxxxx"? That way I won't be guessing how much members I have in a set (particularly if members of said set run into many thousands) and don't rely (as I did previously) on my text files to do "estimates", which, as we've seen, could be wrong and misleading and I would be able to view this with the "-terse" option.