From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Brian Mearns" Subject: Re: Is p-o-m still the correct thing to use? Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 08:23:05 -0400 Message-ID: <4df3a1330808290523j1f2de25bmcee66202cd64eefe@mail.gmail.com> References: <488A7D17.4070506@gmail.com> <488EF032.5020000@gmail.com> <48B744CC.6080903@gmail.com> <37034.89.107.243.1.1219995640.squirrel@www.arcoscom.com> <48B7CF95.2080900@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=BW2auBNheen4ztZHUZkfEAhJnfa8P3feUOeBqUQ/DcA=; b=L1KNcDQ3g8IaEjCGbU8igXQBLWNObzZiMxtEjocVN6yUBfPxw+vpm39wqUAY8oGo0Q N2tKk8cEp8RVbCG546dlskbgEg4PLDgtw/pnwKVuHpq0NBMhqsHBq9yQek1Hv/p7Gty/ rZO4b6LF2Tr0SawQ04RIpwfi+ZOUXVehLaFLI= In-Reply-To: <48B7CF95.2080900@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org, linux@arcoscom.com No, I don't have any TARPIT modules in either folder. Does that means I have to patch the kernel? because I thought xtables didn't require that. Or is there a way to just copy it in? Thanks, -Brian ArcosCom Linux User wrote: > > Has you the kernel module for TARPIT (look for it into kernel modules= , > usually into /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/net/netfilter or > .../net/ipv4/netfilter). > > Or perhaps the problem was that you have the "ipt" version and the "x= t" > version and there is a problem with them at the same time. > > Regards > > El Vie, 29 de Agosto de 2008, 2:37, Brian Mearns escribi=F3: >> >> Thanks for the help Jan and Andrew. I've got xtables (combined) and = it >> built and installed fine. When I run iptables --version, it matches >> what's given in the versions file in the source distribution. My pro= blem >> is that the TARPIT target doesn't seem to be recognized. When I try = to >> add a rule with the TARPIT target, it says "iptables: No >> chain/target/match by that name". I've tried using rules that work >> otherwise, for instance, changing from DROP to TARPIT, and it still >> doesn't work, so it's not the rest of the rule that is the problem. >> >> I found libxt_TARPIT.so in /usr/local/libexec/xtables/. Is it in the >> wrong spot or something? Also, my service runs from /sbin/iptables, = but >> this is soft linked to /usr/local/sbin/iptables: could this be part = of >> the problem? I did this so my package manager doesn't overwrite it a= ny >> point, but maybe it was a bad idea? >> >> Any help would be great. >> >> Thanks, >> -Brian >> >> Jan Engelhardt wrote: >>> >>> On Tuesday 2008-07-29 06:25, Brian Mearns wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks a lot for the help, Andrew. The iptables source I have >>>> doesn't have a configure script...oh, but it does have an autogen >>>> script. I guess I was probably supposed to use that first. But it'= s >>>> a moot point, apparently, because of xtables, so I will be >>>> switching to that. >>> >>> Released tarballs should have configure; for autogen, you usually >>> need (even more) developer tools than you do without, like >>> autoconf, automake, and the other autowhatevers. >>> >>> No moot point; iptables still is, as of today, the name of the >>> userspace package and control program. >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter"= in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > >