netfilter.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lutfi ODUNCUOGLU <lutfio@metu.edu.tr>
To: ntop-dev@unipi.it
Cc: Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@ngtech.co.il>, netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New/Updated L7 netfilter  option - nDPI
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:38:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5093BEAB.2040002@metu.edu.tr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5092FE2D.40009@wildgooses.com>

Hello,

I compiled nDPI-nefilter patch and it works fine. What I want is to 
shape the p2p traffic in my network. For this purpose i just implemented 
the nDPI-netfilter patch as two different ways for testing

  iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o XXX -m ndpi --bittorrent -j 
CONNMARK --set-mark 1


iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m connmark --mark 1  -j CLASSIFY 
--set-class 0001:0010

or

iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m ndpi --bittorrent  -j CLASSIFY 
--set-class 0001:0010


So which one is more suitable for use? I don't know if this patch 
inspects connections (marks connection) or every single packet (marks 
every single) for a match.


Regards,

Lutfi


On 11/02/2012 12:56 AM, Ed W wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 22:03, Andrew Beverley wrote:
>> On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 16:57 +0200, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
>>>> I have to admit that I only had limited success with l7-filter,
>>>> although
>>>> it no longer appears to be maintained anyway.
>>>>
>>> What would you want to achieve from a using l7 iptables?
>>> filtering? scheduling?
>> At the time I was using it to do traffic shaping, to prevent p2p
>> applications overloading a network with low bandwidth internet
>> connection. The problem was that it only needed one p2p application to
>> not be identified for the network to be overloaded. So in the end I took
>> a rather rudimentary approach and just identified any client making lots
>> of connections to ports above 1024:
>>
>> http://www.andybev.com/index.php/Fair_traffic_shaping_an_ADSL_line_for_a_local_network_using_Linux
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> I think it's safe to assume that at least a determined attacker can
> avoid these filters. Ideally you want them reasonably accurate for the
> normal situation...
>
> I guess you just invented an "L7 Filter" yourself... It's just as good a
> match for certain requirements...!
>
> Let me know if you measure this thing against your problem?
>
> Cheers
>
> Ed W
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-dev mailing list
> Ntop-dev@listgateway.unipi.it
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-02 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-24 22:53 New/Updated L7 netfilter option - nDPI Ed W
2012-10-28  8:20 ` Andrew Beverley
2012-10-28 14:57   ` Eliezer Croitoru
2012-11-01 22:03     ` Andrew Beverley
2012-11-01 22:56       ` Ed W
2012-11-02 12:38         ` Lutfi ODUNCUOGLU [this message]
2012-11-02 13:40           ` Ed W
2012-11-06 14:13           ` [Ntop-dev] " Eliezer Croitoru
2012-11-04 15:45         ` Andrew Beverley
2012-10-28 16:34   ` Ed W
2012-10-28 16:39     ` Eliezer Croitoru
2012-10-28 15:07 ` Eliezer Croitoru
2012-10-28 16:03   ` Ed W
2012-10-28 16:51     ` Eliezer Croitoru
2012-10-28 16:57       ` Ed W
2012-10-28 17:57         ` Eliezer Croitoru

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5093BEAB.2040002@metu.edu.tr \
    --to=lutfio@metu.edu.tr \
    --cc=eliezer@ngtech.co.il \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ntop-dev@unipi.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).