From: Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer@ngtech.co.il>
To: "Jörn Krebs" <jk@smartbyte.de>
Cc: netfilter <netfilter@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: VoIP conntrack issue
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:32:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A213B1.4050601@ngtech.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABY2qi9-dYnr8AkTmoeQZgbxM02T=OFw0-FKZoyt+_N6xHuJgA@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/13/2012 5:20 AM, Jörn Krebs wrote:
> Not really, as I use the devices behind the firewall, in many
> networks, so I need one setup that works.
>
> But to be honest, I don't like to start this discussion:
> My question is, why can netfilter not reuse the same port?
> The host inside the firewall is the same, so why can't linux manage a
> port mapping, which says: If a UDP packet comes from host A to us,
> port 1234, AND host B, port 1234, map both to internal host Int1?
> (under the assumption, that Int1 tried to establish the connection
> with Host A and B first).
>
> The point is: There is NO port mapping clash, why is netfilter
> creating one? and does a port remap? (For UDP ... TCP is different.)
Are you sure you understand NAT stun and how port prediction works??
Try to talk IP and ports in a diagram that will make sense to the eye
please.
Regards,
Eliezer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-13 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-13 2:49 VoIP conntrack issue Jörn Krebs
2012-11-13 3:02 ` Neal Murphy
2012-11-13 3:20 ` Jörn Krebs
2012-11-13 9:32 ` Eliezer Croitoru [this message]
2012-11-13 11:42 ` Jörn Krebs
2012-11-13 15:13 ` /dev/rob0
2012-11-13 20:09 ` Eliezer Croitoru
[not found] ` <CABY2qi8w6eDME-OUYM_5Y8Pk63TxBudoHkC54EdzHtuEwQGjZQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-11-13 22:51 ` Fwd: " Jörn Krebs
2012-11-14 1:09 ` Eliezer Croitoru
[not found] ` <CABY2qi_SsfZWzD5=ycNoSVGCCP5YqWro23rJe9THTrLpeEXmww@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <50A2EF09.5030002@ngtech.co.il>
2012-11-14 1:31 ` Jörn Krebs
2012-11-14 1:43 ` Eliezer Croitoru
2012-11-14 1:47 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-11-14 2:35 ` Jörn Krebs
2012-11-14 11:23 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-11-14 15:38 ` Eliezer Croitoru
2012-11-14 15:54 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-11-14 16:01 ` Eliezer Croitoru
2012-11-14 21:33 ` Jörn Krebs
[not found] <CABY2qi8n0ttC99_UktcT+Jwnd9WCCsvk5+ug1GXrrYbd9ixxWw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.LNX.2.01.1211150035180.32273@nerf07.vanv.qr>
2012-11-15 0:15 ` Jörn Krebs
2012-11-15 0:40 ` Payam Chychi
2012-11-15 5:04 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-11-15 5:28 ` Eliezer Croitoru
2012-11-15 7:43 ` Jörn Krebs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A213B1.4050601@ngtech.co.il \
--to=eliezer@ngtech.co.il \
--cc=jk@smartbyte.de \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox