From: tlhackque <tlhackque@yahoo.com>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: -m recent recently broken?
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 11:01:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50B63570.7090008@yahoo.com> (raw)
I recently noticed that a script that sets up a filter is failing. It
may have started failing when I updated iptables to V1.4.15 - I've
updated again to 1.4.16.3 (current, so far as I know).
The culprit seems to be libxt_recent. I've reduced the case to this:
Environment:
-------------------
cat /proc/sys/kernel/osrelease # Yes, I'd like to update, but can't at
the moment...
2.6.22.14-72.fc6
/sbin/ip6tables --version
ip6tables v1.4.16.3
Failing command:
-------------------------
/sbin/ip6tables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 333 -m recent --name white6
--rcheck -j ACCEPT
ip6tables: No chain/target/match by that name.
Additional data:
----------------------
If I remove "-m recent --name white6 --rcheck", the command is accepted.
(But of course is quite useless.)
/proc/net/ipt_recent does not contain white6 (adding this rule should
create it).
>> Could it be that libxt_recent wants the newer location
(/proc/net/xt_recent)?
iptables was built with no options. /sbin/ip6tables is a symbolic link
to ../usr/local/sbin/ip6tables.
strace reveals (edited to remove clutter):
...
stat64("/usr/local/lib/xtables/libxt_recent.so", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755,
st_size=21699, ...}) = 0
open("/usr/local/lib/xtables/libxt_recent.so", O_RDONLY) = 3
...(mmap, close)
socket(PF_INET6, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_RAW) = 3
fcntl64(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0
getsockopt(3, SOL_IPV6, 0x40 /* IPV6_??? */,
"filter\0\0\250R\366\267\267\342\22\0\377\377\377\377\300\357\21\0000\211\4\10P\366\21\0"...,
[84]) = 0
getsockopt(3, SOL_IPV6, 0x41 /* IPV6_??? */,
"filter\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"...,
[22328]) = 0
setsockopt(3, SOL_IPV6, 0x40 /* IPV6_??? */,
"filter\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 22888)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
close(3) = 0
write(2, "ip6tables: No chain/target/match"..., 47ip6tables: No
chain/target/match by that name.) = 47
--
This communication may not represent my employer's views,
if any, on the matters discussed.
reply other threads:[~2012-11-28 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50B63570.7090008@yahoo.com \
--to=tlhackque@yahoo.com \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).