From: David Gubler <dg@doodle.com>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: connlimit reached - cannot open connections even after I close some
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:22:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51014395.1000101@doodle.com> (raw)
Hi list,
I want to solve a seemingly simple problem: Limit the number of TCP
connections coming from a single IP address to a web server on port
8080. (background: we had some misbehaving clients eating up a lot of
server resources by opening 400 parallel connections from a single IP -
that number is unreasonnable even for proxy servers, so I want to
enforce a limit)
This sounds like a case for connlimit, so this is what I did (max 4
connections for easier testing):
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --syn --dport 8080 -m connlimit
--connlimit-above 4 -j REJECT
Fetching files with wget --limit-rate=1 shows that this works... sort of.
The fifth connection fails as expected, but after I kill some of the
other connections (verified with netstat -anp | grep ESTABLISHED), I
*still* cannot open new connections!
To be able to connect again, I have to cease *any* connect attempts for
about two minutes. If I repeatedly try to connect, I'm not able to
connect ever again (!), even when there are no more established connections.
As far as I can tell, the problem is the way connlimit works: It looks
at the conntrack table and considers all entries there, even the
SYN_WAIT ones (the ones that have been rejected by connlimit end up in
that state). Or to put it differently: If connlimit denies a connection,
that connection will *still* create a conntrack entry and thus will also
count against the connection limit. This can be verified using the
"conntrack -L" command.
This behaviour makes this simple setup completely unusable for us,
because if some IP accidentally hits the limit I want that IP to be able
to connect again as soon as it is back below the limit. Think well
behaving NATs or proxy servers: They might have a very short burst which
goes over the limit, so I want to block them for a few seconds, but
after that things should immediately go back to normal.
After some research I came up with the following:
In addition to the connlimit rule above, I added
iptables -A PREROUTING -t raw -p tcp --dport 8080 -m connlimit
--connlimit-above 4 -j NOTRACK
iptables -A OUTPUT -t raw -p tcp --sport 8080 -m connlimit
--connlimit-above 4 -j NOTRACK
This prevents conntrack table entries from being created for connections
that are over the limit.
But:
* Does this really do what I think it does (i.e. do you think this is
safe for production)?
* It looks like there is a race condition: Some other connection could
get closed between the NOTRACK and the REJECT rule. Result: A new
connection would not get a conntrack entry because it is over the limit
at first, but later would not be rejected because it is now under the
limit. Could that be an issue?
* Is this a bug in connlimit?
* Am I missing something else (e.g. an undocumented parameter for
connlimit)?
Thanks!
David
--
David Gubler
Senior Software & Operations Engineer
MeetMe: http://doodle.com/david
E-Mail: dg@doodle.com
next reply other threads:[~2013-01-24 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-24 14:22 David Gubler [this message]
2013-02-03 11:51 ` connlimit reached - cannot open connections even after I close some Pascal Hambourg
2013-02-04 11:29 ` David Gubler
2013-02-05 19:54 ` Pascal Hambourg
2013-02-11 12:44 ` David Gubler
[not found] <77346cbd-787d-4e7e-a918-d1b858d56b25@me.com>
2013-01-24 15:08 ` David Gubler
[not found] ` <CAHn-yPwtNh6sSo0PMScgavbgS=5mmLGaUHmQrj4wJQxMj4pWpA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-01-28 16:17 ` David Gubler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51014395.1000101@doodle.com \
--to=dg@doodle.com \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox