From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Nikolai Zhubr <n-a-zhubr@yandex.ru>,
libvirt-users@redhat.com, netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] netfilter+libvirt=(smth got broken?)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:18:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <514A7BFD.5060401@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130321023046.GA4189@localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1488 bytes --]
On 03/20/2013 08:30 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>
>> So apparently, netfilter's behaviour was indeed reversed at some
>> point, therefore libvirt stopped working properly.
>
> --ctdir was broken and it was fixed in patch:
In other words, the kernel folks made a silent change in ABI. Eww.
How can we reliably tell which kernels have the old behavior, and which
have the new, so that libvirt knows which sense to use?
> By looking at the changes you made:
>
>> --A FI-vnet0 -p tcp -m tcp --sport 110 -m conntrack --ctstate
>> ESTABLISHED -m conntrack --ctdir ORIGINAL -j RETURN
>> +-A FI-vnet0 -p tcp -m tcp --sport 110 -m conntrack --ctstate
>> ESTABLISHED -m conntrack --ctdir REPLY -j RETURN
>
> The first rule looks wrong to me indeed, traffic coming in the
> original direction will initiate the connection to destination port
> TCP/110. Therefore, your change is correct.
Correct for the new kernel interpretation, but we also want to support
use of libvirt with older kernels, preferably with a runtime check so
that a binary compiled on an older kernel will still work after a kernel
upgrade.
>
> It's unfortunate nobody noticed this rule was incorrect so far (even
> if it was working).
It's also unfortunate that the kernel folks did a silent ABI change,
without offering any witness of which behavior is in operation.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 621 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-21 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-20 12:47 netfilter+libvirt=(smth got broken?) Nikolai Zhubr
2013-03-20 13:06 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2013-03-20 13:41 ` Nikolai Zhubr
[not found] ` <514A1F0A.4090402@laine.org>
[not found] ` <514A1F0A.4090402-k/Ak44NBdeXYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-20 23:01 ` Nikolai Zhubr
2013-03-21 2:30 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-03-21 3:18 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2013-03-21 9:55 ` [libvirt-users] " Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-03-22 10:53 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-03-22 18:10 ` Laine Stump
2013-03-26 14:18 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-03-27 18:22 ` Laine Stump
2013-03-21 10:32 ` Nikolai Zhubr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=514A7BFD.5060401@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=libvirt-users@redhat.com \
--cc=n-a-zhubr@yandex.ru \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox