Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org>
To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problems with bridge+router setup
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:44:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5681128F.5090203@plouf.fr.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7f5d15a0a7067992b1ae21b149d64266@vpn.quintux.com>

Misterke a écrit :
> 
> Client B however is a Digital TV box and my triple-play provider 
> unfortunately requires those to be directly connected to the cable 
> modem, which will hand them actually a DHCP address in a particular 
> range and probably do other special stuff.

Does it use VLAN tagging (IEEE 802.1q) or plain ethernet ?

> So, what I would like the RPi2 to do is:
>   - For ethernet frames TO or FROM specific MAC adresses (those of 
> clients of type B) on its eth1 side, just pass them on from/to eth0
>   - For anything else, behave like a router and have iptables rules 
> dictate what is allowed and when outputting to the eth0-side do 
> NAT/masquerading

What about broadcast packets such as ARP requests or DHCP replies sent
by the cable modem ? How do you decide if they should be bridged ?

>       * -A INPUT -p icmp -m icmp --icmp-type source-quench -j ACCEPT

ICMP source quench is deprecated and considered harmful.

> But I also have additional questions:
>    - To act as a router, I need IP addresses at both sides of the 
> bridge.  At the eth0 side, that should
>      be a DHCP address coming from the cable modem, but at the other end 
> it should be a static address.
>      Now, in the previous simple bridge setup, I already had the bridge 
> get a DHCP address and I could
>      even add a second static address to br0, but then those addresses 
> would exist at both ends of the
>      bridge, right?  So, should I then create ebtables/iptables rules 
> somehow to avoid that someone
>      would notice the internal IP address on the internet and vice 
> versa?
>    - Next to that, when running dnsmasq to hand out DHCP addresses, I of 
> course don't want it to start
>      offering addresses to the Internet side of the bridge.  So, either 
> I somehow need to tell dnsmasq
>      to only work on the LAN side (eth1) or perhaps I would again have 
> to somehow limit this with
>      ebtables/iptables.
> 
> Any advice from anyone on all this?

My advice is to not use br0 but only eth0 and eth1 for IP setup, DHCP,
routing and so on.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-28 10:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-27 11:00 Problems with bridge+router setup Kurt Haenen
2015-12-27 19:21 ` Neal P. Murphy
2015-12-28  9:57   ` Misterke
2015-12-28 10:44     ` Pascal Hambourg [this message]
2015-12-28 16:33       ` Misterke
2015-12-28 18:46         ` Pascal Hambourg
2015-12-28 20:59           ` Misterke
2015-12-28 23:28             ` Pascal Hambourg
2015-12-28 22:50     ` Neal P. Murphy
2016-01-02 11:26       ` Misterke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5681128F.5090203@plouf.fr.eu.org \
    --to=pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox