From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Edmundo Carmona Subject: Re: Forward specific port to another ip Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:20:57 -0400 Message-ID: <65aa6af90512280520u6c7bc305q6d845d10e96602b@mail.gmail.com> References: <65aa6af90512271255g1d90b33eg50a61f08ca16ce3b@mail.gmail.com> <005b01c60b6d$70c55840$1101a8c0@quebec> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <005b01c60b6d$70c55840$1101a8c0@quebec> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org OK OK.... keep your shirt on! :-) On 12/28/05, Richard Pickett wrote: > > Remember I said "for starters". You have to consider more things in > > order to make it work... depending on your networking environment. :-) > > > > On 12/27/05, Richard Pickett > wrote: > > > Here's something to keep in mind on NAT, it only works if the NAT > box is > > > in-between both systems or you can double-NAT. > > I wasn't addressing the completeness or lack of completeness of your > post at all. > > I was addressing the post where Andy notes his telnet hangs. If the two > systems have direct routes he would need to double nat, and that's what > I was pointing out to him. > > >