* coexistence between nftables and iptables ?
@ 2025-11-06 9:44 PierluigiFrullani
2025-11-06 12:13 ` George Shuklin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: PierluigiFrullani @ 2025-11-06 9:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Hello all,
first post here so please be indulgent.
I was wandering if I those two "technologies" can coexist.
My problem is: I have a small machine that does firewalling for my home net, and on this machine there is also a docker environment.
Docker use iptables for his internal stuff and for forwarding traffic between host ( and his net ) and dockers themselves. It does this by creating a quite complex number of rules and tables, which btw are handled by docker daemon and scripts.
So far so good you might say. Well... no.
being that also my iptables rules are quite comples I used, when in need of modify them in some way, to flush all iptables and start all over again.
This will flush also all other docker rules so that the docker environment does not work anymore unless I stop and restart the daemon ( which obviously is not always acceptable ).
If I can use nftables for my firewalling and routing needs, and leave iptables only for docker, then I can flush my nftables whenever I want, without impacting docker environment.
Is that true ?
Is that possible ?
Thanks in advance and sorry for my poor english.
Pierluigi ( from Italy )
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: coexistence between nftables and iptables ?
2025-11-06 9:44 coexistence between nftables and iptables ? PierluigiFrullani
@ 2025-11-06 12:13 ` George Shuklin
2025-11-06 13:08 ` PierluigiFrullani
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: George Shuklin @ 2025-11-06 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
There is DOCKER-USER chain for those things.
Don't try to use 'iptables for docker, nftables for filtering, it will
cause a lot of bugs and issues.
See ready-made template which allow to add firewall rules into nftables
to filter ports for both local (non-docker) and docker-hosted applications.
https://github.com/lidofinance/ansible-collection-server/blob/master/roles/docker_iptables/templates/iptables.rules.j2
(If you use Ansible, you can grab ready-made collection from Galaxy
https://galaxy.ansible.com/ui/repo/published/lidofinance/server/docs/)
On 11/6/25 11:44 AM, PierluigiFrullani wrote:
> Hello all,
> first post here so please be indulgent.
> I was wandering if I those two "technologies" can coexist.
> My problem is: I have a small machine that does firewalling for my home net, and on this machine there is also a docker environment.
> Docker use iptables for his internal stuff and for forwarding traffic between host ( and his net ) and dockers themselves. It does this by creating a quite complex number of rules and tables, which btw are handled by docker daemon and scripts.
>
> So far so good you might say. Well... no.
> being that also my iptables rules are quite comples I used, when in need of modify them in some way, to flush all iptables and start all over again.
> This will flush also all other docker rules so that the docker environment does not work anymore unless I stop and restart the daemon ( which obviously is not always acceptable ).
>
> If I can use nftables for my firewalling and routing needs, and leave iptables only for docker, then I can flush my nftables whenever I want, without impacting docker environment.
>
> Is that true ?
> Is that possible ?
>
>
> Thanks in advance and sorry for my poor english.
>
> Pierluigi ( from Italy )
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: coexistence between nftables and iptables ?
2025-11-06 12:13 ` George Shuklin
@ 2025-11-06 13:08 ` PierluigiFrullani
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: PierluigiFrullani @ 2025-11-06 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter, George Shuklin
On Thursday, 6 November 2025 13:13:52 CET George Shuklin wrote:
> There is DOCKER-USER chain for those things.
Not really:
Or at least not really for my need:
# iptables -L -v -n | grep ^Cha | grep DO
Chain DOCKER (3 references)
Chain DOCKER-ISOLATION-STAGE-1 (1 references)
Chain DOCKER-ISOLATION-STAGE-2 (3 references)
Chain DOCKER-USER (1 references)
~# iptables -t nat -L -v -n | grep ^Cha | grep DO
Chain DOCKER (2 references)
I do not need to play with DOCKER-USER chain. Rules created by daemon for me are fine.
I do need to modify all other rules ( INPUT-FORWARD-OUTPUT PRE and POSTROUTING ) for all other needs __except__ dockers, but I do this, usually by flushing all availables chains ( at least to be sure that at boot everything works )
In my firewall start script I have:
/usr/sbin/iptables -w -F
/usr/sbin/iptables -w -t nat -F
/usr/sbin/iptables -w -t raw -F
/usr/sbin/iptables -w -X
Obviously the -F and the -X will "kill" every rule and chain, thus also DOCKERs one ( and those that call the jump to DOCKERs )
>
> Don't try to use 'iptables for docker, nftables for filtering, it will
> cause a lot of bugs and issues.
That's my suspect :)
> See ready-made template which allow to add firewall rules into nftables
> to filter ports for both local (non-docker) and docker-hosted applications.
>
> https://github.com/lidofinance/ansible-collection-server/blob/master/roles/docker_iptables/templates/iptables.rules.j2
This link leads to an 404 page :(
> (If you use Ansible, you can grab ready-made collection from Galaxy
> https://galaxy.ansible.com/ui/repo/published/lidofinance/server/docs/)
>
Thanks
Pigi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-11-06 13:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-11-06 9:44 coexistence between nftables and iptables ? PierluigiFrullani
2025-11-06 12:13 ` George Shuklin
2025-11-06 13:08 ` PierluigiFrullani
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).