From: "Mattias Rönnblom" <hofors@lysator.liu.se>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Multiple nf_bind_pf to the same protocol
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:12:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87639rhq7t.fsf@isengard.friendlyfire.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AEEFB23.407@trash.net> (Patrick McHardy's message of "Mon\, 02 Nov 2009 16\:30\:43 +0100")
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> writes:
> Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> with NFQUEUE and the libnetfilter_queue library, is it possible to
>> bind several applications to same protocol (for example, AF_INET)?
>>
>> That would be useful if you want to do load balancing on a multicore
>> system, with a thread/process serving each NFQUEUE queue.
>>
>> After having a brief look at the NFQUEUE/libnetfilter_queue code, it
>> looks like there's only single netlink fd for all queues, and the
>> library does the demultiplexing. Would that mean I have to have a
>> "front-end" thread distributing different servering threads?
>
> You can bind them to different group numbers for the same AF.
> The latest version of the NFQUEUE target even supports automatic
> balancing between those groups based on a simple flow hash.
Do you by "group number" mean NFQUEUE queue number? If so, how would I
do that? The data comes on a single netlink fd, which is serviced by
one thread, which is suppose to give the data chunk to
libnetfilter_queue (nfq_handle_packet). The libary executes a callback
(depending on queue number) in the context of that thread. At least
that is my understanding of NFQUEUE/libnetfilter_queue.
(Automatic load balancing sounds great btw.)
Best regards,
Mattias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-03 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-02 15:09 Multiple nf_bind_pf to the same protocol Mattias Rönnblom
2009-11-02 15:30 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-11-03 10:12 ` Mattias Rönnblom [this message]
2009-11-03 10:50 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87639rhq7t.fsf@isengard.friendlyfire.se \
--to=hofors@lysator.liu.se \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox