Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike <1100100@gmail.com>
To: Miguel Laborde <miguel.laborde@qlogitek.com>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Port 21, 23, and 80 are open according to Shields Up at grc.com
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:39:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ca4228204091308394b0fbc3e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C8DE82BEF24D0146862937D2A9DD0E92254489@qlmail2.qlogitek.com>

I like that too. Will do.
Thanks Miguel.

Best regards.

Mike


On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:21:13 -0400, Miguel Laborde
<miguel.laborde@qlogitek.com> wrote:
> Something else you can try is using the lsof command.
> 
> Give lsof -i tcp:21 a try and see what it returns. If you have something running on that port it will tell you its name and PID.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>         Miguel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
> [mailto:netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org]On Behalf Of Mike
> Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 11:18 AM
> To: Jason Opperisano
> Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Subject: Re: Port 21, 23, and 80 are open according to Shields Up at
> grc.com
> 
> Hi J,
> 
> Thanks for the guidance.
> There's definitely no DNATing/PREROUTING currently set up in the
> iptables firewall.  So, I guess the only thing that could explain port
> 21 and/or 23 is there must be an ftp daemon using those ports.
> 
> As for port 80, I wonder if it's got anything to do with Apache
> running the intranet webserver inside the LAN.  I don't believe I've
> got apache even installed on the routerbox.
> 
> Well, enough guessing.  I'll try some netstat research and see what
> percolates to the surface.
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> Mike
> 
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 08:53:07 -0400, Jason Opperisano <opie@817west.com> wrote:
> >
> > you need to keep in mind that if your netfilter box is performing
> > MASQ/SNAT for your LAN machines--the IP being scanned by grc.com is the
> > public IP of the netfilter box.
> >
> > unless your doing some DNATs to machines on your LAN--you should focus
> > your efforts on the netfilter machine itself.
> >
> > "netstat -lntu" would be a good place to start.
> >
> > i've always questioned the output of web-based scanners like grc.com;
> > however, i just went to grc.com and tried it out, and achieved a
> > *perfect* "TruStealth" rating...which must mean i'm super l33t like
> > stevie...  :-P
> >
> > -j
> >
> > --
> > Jason Opperisano <opie@817west.com>
> >
> >
> 
>


  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-13 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-13 15:21 Port 21, 23, and 80 are open according to Shields Up at grc.com Miguel Laborde
2004-09-13 15:39 ` Mike [this message]
2004-09-13 16:04 ` Jose Maria Lopez
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-11 18:50 MAC addresses Darren Kirby
2004-09-11 23:09 ` Port 21, 23, and 80 are open according to Shields Up at grc.com Mike
2004-09-11 23:14   ` George Alexandru Dragoi
2004-09-12  7:38     ` Mike
2004-09-13  1:15       ` George Alexandru Dragoi
2004-09-13 12:35         ` Mike
2004-09-14  1:01           ` Nick Drage
2004-09-13 12:53   ` Jason Opperisano
2004-09-13 15:18     ` Mike
2004-09-13 21:22     ` James B. Hiller
2004-09-13 23:47       ` Mike
2004-09-14  5:09         ` Mike

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8ca4228204091308394b0fbc3e@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=1100100@gmail.com \
    --cc=miguel.laborde@qlogitek.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox