From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Filip Sneppe Subject: Re: I need help with "CONNMARK --set-mark" Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:09:22 +0200 Message-ID: <9151ac2a0504140609156b7008@mail.gmail.com> References: <200504111134.26674.adrian.turcu@gmvinteractive.com> <200504141332.41565.adrian.turcu@gmvinteractive.com> <20050414124539.GA1297@bender.817west.com> Reply-To: Filip Sneppe Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050414124539.GA1297@bender.817west.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Jason Opperisano , netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Hi, On 4/14/05, Jason Opperisano wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:32:33PM +0100, Adrian Turcu wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > I'm just trying to revive this as there was no answer till now. Maybe I= 'm > > lucky this time :) >=20 I haven't followed this in great detail either, but I do know that some people reported problems with the firewall MARK in combination with tc filter ... fwmark on the LARTC mailing list. I do remember someone explicitly using a u32 mark match too. I don't know what the details were, but could you give a different kernel a try ? Sorry, I thought I kept the exact mail thread in my mailbox, but I must have deleted it... You may want to check the LARTC archives for more= =20 info.=20 So try a different kernel first, if the problem persists and you're convinc= ed that this is a bug, you may want to take this to the -devel mailing list, w= here the author of the CONNMARK patch also hangs out. Regards, Filip