From: "Jeremy Davis" <jeremy@slicenet.net>
To: Netfilter List <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: RE: Additional Security
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 17:17:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AGEBICCCEMOAKANLEDBAMECECDAA.jeremy@slicenet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200309191739.h8JHdnKI008523@discmail.com>
At the moment I am trying to wing myself off of tripwire in favor of
something else to do file integrity. Tripwire, when downloaded from its
website, seg faults on redhat 9. tripwire is a good solution for post
compromised forensic analysis.
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
[mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org]On Behalf Of Aldo S. Lagana
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 1:40 PM
To: 'Jeffrey Laramie'; netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: Additional Security
Tripwire seems to be a filesystem monitor - I wouldn't necessarily run it or
feel more secure running it, but others may disagree...
I run portsentry, snort, squid and iptables (along with poptop and freeswan
VPN servers)
-----Original Message-----
From: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
[mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Laramie
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 1:15 PM
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Hi All,
I previously used Redhat releases for my firewall boxes, and they
install iptables and tripwire by default. I have switched to SuSE 8.2
which doesn't install tripwire by default. My question is:
Do you think it's worthwhile to install and configure tripwire on an
iptables firewall box?
I can't think of a better forum to get a straight opinion on this and I
think this topic is of interest to most of the list members. However I
understand this thread is off topic and will gladly take it off list or
move it to another forum if you can suggest one.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-19 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-19 17:14 Additional Security Jeffrey Laramie
2003-09-19 17:39 ` Aldo S. Lagana
2003-09-19 21:17 ` Jeremy Davis [this message]
2003-09-20 12:09 ` Chris Brenton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-20 13:27 Martinez, Michael
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AGEBICCCEMOAKANLEDBAMECECDAA.jeremy@slicenet.net \
--to=jeremy@slicenet.net \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox