From: "ding dang" <jiadeip@hotmail.com>
To: spoft@sohu.com
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Could someone tell me the rules of port translation in SNAT ?
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 09:49:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BAY10-F100u8E4ej3vp0003a1c1@hotmail.com> (raw)
>From: "spoft" <spoft@sohu.com>
>To: "ding dang" <jiadeip@hotmail.com>
>Subject: Re: Could someone tell me the rules of port translation in SNAT ?
>Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:19:53 +0800
>
>dst ip, dst port, and SNATed sport of the connections must be unique. So
the firewall can NATed correctly and enough.
>So when:
> 1) dst ip and dst port are same,then the SNATed sport must be
different between two connetions.
> 2) dst ip or dst port is different, then the SNATed sport may be same
between two connections.
Thanks.
For 2) above: when will the SNATed sport be different then?
> >
> > But what i observed is:(SNAT using UDP port 20000-30000)
> >
> > private addr netfilter port Internet addr
> > 10.0.0.8:2000 ---> 20000 ----> 193.0.0.8:3000
> > 10.0.0.8:2001 ---> 20000 ----> 193.0.0.8:3001
> > 10.0.0.8:2002 ---> 20000 ----> 193.0.0.8:3002
> > that means DIFFERENT UDP requests from private network for DIFFERENT
> > Internet destination result in a same Netfilter port no matter the
Internet
> > destination sends reply or not ;
> >
> > private addr netfilter port Internet addr
> > 10.0.0.8:2000 ---> 20000 ----> 193.0.0.8:3000
> > 10.0.0.8:2001 ---> 20001 ----> 193.0.0.8:3000
> > 10.0.0.8:2002 ---> 20002 ----> 193.0.0.8:3000
> > DIFFERENT UDP requests from private network for a SAME Internet
destination
> > result in DIFFERENT Netfilter ports, why?
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > 与联机的朋友进行交流,请使用 MSN Messenger:
http://messenger.msn.com/cn
> >
> >
> >
_________________________________________________________________
与联机的朋友进行交流,请使用 MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com/cn
next reply other threads:[~2004-01-07 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-07 9:49 ding dang [this message]
2004-01-07 10:08 ` Could someone tell me the rules of port translation in SNAT ? Antony Stone
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-08 1:55 ding dang
2004-01-07 7:37 ding dang
2004-01-05 6:22 ding dang
2004-01-05 11:14 ` Antony Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BAY10-F100u8E4ej3vp0003a1c1@hotmail.com \
--to=jiadeip@hotmail.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=spoft@sohu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox