From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Markus" Subject: RE: 2 dif. connections separated Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 16:33:31 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: References: <200407201523.38637.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200407201523.38637.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org HiHo! I hope he doesn't want connection tracking, as IMHO he will only see UNREPLIED connections. Isn't this a problem for the nat-modules, like ftp? But than again he probably doesn't need them. I am just curious.. ciao markus > -----Original Message----- > From: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org > [mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org]On Behalf Of Antony Stone > Sent: Dienstag, 20. Juli 2004 16:24 > To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org > Subject: Re: 2 dif. connections separated > > > On Tuesday 20 July 2004 3:13 pm, Pablo Allietti wrote: > > > i have 2 router to internet 1 for 200.40.226.65 and other with > > 200.40.224.65 > > > > is possible to divide this connections to make > > > > 200.40.226.64 // outgoing traffic > > > > 200.40.224.64 // input traffic ??? > > > > with iptables ? > > Yes. Set the default gateway for the router to point up 200.40.226.64's > link, and use SNAT to set all packets to have source address 200.40.224.65. > > Then hope the ISP doesn't do strict ingress / egress filtering... :) > > Regards, > > Antony. > > -- > Most people have more than the average number of legs. > > Please reply to the list; > please don't CC me. > > >