From: "Markus" <listuser@sally.epygi.de>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: 2 dif. connections separated
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 17:03:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BDEHJGPIKNLKJJBCCFPLEEJICOAA.listuser@sally.epygi.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200407201554.45401.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk>
HiHo!
I think he has two routers, aka two different machines ;)
ciao
markus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
> [mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org]On Behalf Of Antony Stone
> Sent: Dienstag, 20. Juli 2004 16:55
> To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Subject: Re: 2 dif. connections separated
>
>
> On Tuesday 20 July 2004 3:33 pm, Markus wrote:
>
> > HiHo!
> >
> > I hope he doesn't want connection tracking, as IMHO he will
> > only see UNREPLIED connections.
>
> Why? Netfilter will see the packets go out, adn it will see the replies come
> back in. It won't care how they got to/from the Internet.
>
> > Isn't this a problem for the nat-modules, like ftp?
>
> I think they should work exactly as they do for a single connection setup.
>
> If he had two separate netfilter machines, now *that* would be difficult to
> handle...
>
> Regards,
>
> Antony.
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
> > > [mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org]On Behalf Of Antony Stone
> > > Sent: Dienstag, 20. Juli 2004 16:24
> > > To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> > > Subject: Re: 2 dif. connections separated
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 20 July 2004 3:13 pm, Pablo Allietti wrote:
> > > > i have 2 router to internet 1 for 200.40.226.65 and other with
> > > > 200.40.224.65
> > > >
> > > > is possible to divide this connections to make
> > > >
> > > > 200.40.226.64 // outgoing traffic
> > > >
> > > > 200.40.224.64 // input traffic ???
> > > >
> > > > with iptables ?
> > >
> > > Yes. Set the default gateway for the router to point up 200.40.226.64's
> > > link, and use SNAT to set all packets to have source address
> > > 200.40.224.65.
> > >
> > > Then hope the ISP doesn't do strict ingress / egress filtering... :)
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Antony.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Most people have more than the average number of legs.
> > >
> > > Please reply to the
> > > list; please don't CC me.
>
> --
> The lottery is a tax for people who can't do maths.
>
> Please reply to the list;
> please don't CC me.
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-20 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-20 14:13 2 dif. connections separated Pablo Allietti
2004-07-20 14:23 ` Antony Stone
2004-07-20 14:33 ` Markus
2004-07-20 14:54 ` Antony Stone
2004-07-20 15:03 ` Markus [this message]
2004-07-20 15:04 ` Markus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BDEHJGPIKNLKJJBCCFPLEEJICOAA.listuser@sally.epygi.de \
--to=listuser@sally.epygi.de \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox