Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Seferovic Edvin" <edvin.seferovic@kolp.at>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, poptop-server@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Netfilter and Poptop ( and stuff ... )
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 08:28:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1EOr9T-0001D1-Ma@mail.sourceforge.net> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1760 bytes --]

Hi,

 

first of all - excuse me for mailing this to two mailing lists at once, but
I am hoping to get more answers from your experience with poptop and
netfilter. 

 

Here is my situation - I've configured a gateway with poptop ( which uses
RADIUS for auth/acct - which again uses LDAP as auth-backend and mySQL for
accounting ). This gateway has 2 internal and one external interface ( with
public routeable IP address ). One internal interface is used to build a
restricted network for unknown machines, and the second one is used as a
gateway for the known machines. Now - I would like allow my VPN users
internet access, but not to all machines on the internal network. So I have
to use NAT on the tunnel endpoints ( ppp+ interfaces ), right? 

 

I wanted to make this easy as possible, but as always - I took the wrong
turn... probably by choosing Firewall Builder to help me get my firewall set
up. I achived everything, but I cannot configure ppp+ interfaces in
FW-Builder? Does anyone has a hint for me? Is this possible anyway ( please
don't tell me I have to configure 150 ppp interfaces in FW-Builder ) ??? 

 

I suppose it would be more secure to enter a firewall rule every time a ppp
interface comes up ( by using scripts like ip-up from pppd )? Do I have to
enter a NAT rule for each interface then? Any performance thought when
having 150+ interfaces at the same time? 

 

Nevertheless I would also like to redirect http traffic going from a NATed
ppp+ interface to my squid process - how does this combined rule looks like?


 

Sorry for this huge eMail, and amateur questions.. I hope at least a few of
the gurus out there will be able and willing to help me out...

 

Thank You in advance !

 

Regards,

 

Edvin Seferovic

 

 

 


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5810 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2005-10-10  6:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-10  6:28 Seferovic Edvin [this message]
2005-10-10 15:15 ` Netfilter and Poptop ( and stuff ... ) Phil Oester
2005-10-11 17:33   ` Seferovic Edvin
     [not found] <20051010062902.A7C34F4DA@sorry.no-ip-here.net>
2005-10-10 11:29 ` /dev/rob0
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-10  6:28 Seferovic Edvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1EOr9T-0001D1-Ma@mail.sourceforge.net \
    --to=edvin.seferovic@kolp.at \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=poptop-server@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox