From: "Derick Anderson" <danderson@vikus.com>
To: "Harrison, James" <james.harrison@americancolor.com>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: Troubleshooting Netfilter Firewall (performance issues)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:42:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <FAC4E024BF776842876169173CE2F0132950@mailbox.vikus.com> (raw)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harrison, James [mailto:james.harrison@americancolor.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 1:24 PM
> To: Derick Anderson
> Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Subject: RE: Troubleshooting Netfilter Firewall (performance issues)
>
> On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 12:55 -0500, Derick Anderson wrote:
> [snip]
>
> >
> > If I were you I would monitor top during a large transfer
> and maybe do
> > an ethereal dump as well. If your two endpoint machines are both on
> > Gbit LAN and your firewall is 100Mbit (on a 100/1000 switch) then
> > perhaps your firewall NICs are getting overloaded. Every
> night at my
> > company all the servers (Gbit) back up to a local machine
> (100Mbit).
> > They each have their time window for backing up but it's common for
> > Nagios to report an "UNKNOWN" status for the backup server in the
> > early morning hours. Of course that could simply be the poor little
> > backup server not having the time to reply...
> >
> > Derick Anderson
>
> According to netstat -i I shouldn't be having issues with
> overloading the interfaces. (TX-ERR on eth0 and eth1 are
> static and have not
> incremented) I have 2/100MB and 2/1000MB interfaces.
>
> Iface MTU Met RX-OK RX-ERR RX-DRP RX-OVR TX-OK TX-ERR
> TX-DRP TX-OVR Flg
> eth0 1500 0 50757220 0 0 050703586 523
> 0 0 BMRU
> eth0: 1500 0 - no statistics available -
> BMRU
> eth1 1500 0 339989009 0 0 0397086634 3381
> 0 0 BMRU
> eth1: 1500 0 - no statistics available -
> BMRU
> eth2 1500 0 409181861 0 0 0344550753 0
> 0 0 BMRU
> eth3 1500 0 11352902 0 0 015003672 0
> 0 0 BMRU
> eth3: 1500 0 - no statistics available -
> BMRU
>
> It is running on the Devil Linux distro.
>
> --
> James Harrison RHCE
> Manager, Information Security
> AIM: harrijh1
Unless Devil Linux has messed with your TCP/IP options in the kernel,
then I think it's time to look at the firewall. If you have an
abnormally high number of rules, this could be an issue, or if you're
rate-limiting anything...
Derick Anderson
next reply other threads:[~2005-11-04 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-04 14:42 Derick Anderson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-03 17:55 Troubleshooting Netfilter Firewall (performance issues) Derick Anderson
2005-11-03 18:24 ` Harrison, James
2005-11-03 17:28 Harrison, James
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=FAC4E024BF776842876169173CE2F0132950@mailbox.vikus.com \
--to=danderson@vikus.com \
--cc=james.harrison@americancolor.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox