From: Stewart Thompson <stewart.thompson@shaw.ca>
To: Tasha Smith <natasha3641@yahoo.com>, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: iptables: exe
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 16:13:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <FLEKIPPLAEDMJMOOBBDPKEGPCPAA.stewart.thompson@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020921225810.80968.qmail@web20309.mail.yahoo.com>
Hi Tasha:
Try iptables -vL -t nat. The only rule I see on
your original post was a Masquerade rule which would
show up in the nat Postrouting Table. Is that your entire
rule set?
Stu......
-----Original Message-----
From: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
[mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org]On Behalf Of Tasha Smith
Sent: September 21, 2002 3:58 PM
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: iptables: exe
Ok guys: i think they started up with out any errors:)
"chmod 755 firewall" Then i went to my "rc.local" file
and put "sh /etc/init.d/firewall" at the end and
rebooted and i got no error but COULD NOT see anywhere
saying "firewall starting OK" but when i logged
in and tryed the command "iptables vL" I GOT THIS
----------------------------------------------------
Chain INPUT (policy 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prt opt in out source destination
0 0 ACCEPT all --lo any anwhere anwhere
CHain FOrward (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prt opt in out source destination
Chain OUPUT (policy ACCEPT 14 packetts, 1047bytes)
pkts bytes target prt opt in out source destination
0 0 ACCEPT all --lo any anwhere anwhere
------------------------------------------------------
Soo does this mean they started right???
--- Stewart Thompson <stewart.thompson@shaw.ca> wrote:
> Hi Tasha:
>
> The latest Kernel for Redhat 7.2 is 2.4.9-34.
> I would recommend that you upgrade to it. Also,
> Iptables 1.24 shipped with 7.2 not 1.23. Also.
> 1.25 is available on their site. The latest from
> Netfilter
> is 1.27a, but unless you need one of the new
> features,
> you don't require it. I am using 1.24 with great
> success.
> The other thing is to make sure all your packages
> are up
> to date, Iptables is just part of the security.
> Disable any
> functions you don't need on the server.
> Now to your problems. Redhat 7.2 shipped with
> Ipchains set up as the firewall. Have you disabled
> it?
> They can't both be active at the same time.
> Try chown root:root firewall and chmod 775 firewall,
> and see if it executes ok on startup. This is in
> addition
> to the advice from Antony.
> Hope that helps.
>
> Stu......
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org
> [mailto:netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org]On
> Behalf Of Tasha Smith
> Sent: September 21, 2002 2:13 PM
> To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Subject: iptables: exe
>
> Ok...i have my own iptables script trying to get it
> going...here what i have soo far in it...just
> starting
>
> SPECS:
> RedHat 7.2
> 2.4.19 Kernel
> iptables-1.2.3
>
> #######################################
> #!/bin/bash
>
> echo 1 = > /proc/sys/net/ipv4//ip_forward
> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
>
> # Remove any existing rules from all chains.
> iptables --flush
> iptables -t nat --flush
>
> # Unlimited access on the loopback interface
> iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
> iptables -A OUPUT -o lo -j ACCPET
>
> # Set the fefault policy to Drop
> iptables --policy INPUT DROP
> #######################################
> Now... to get this to run on start-up here is what i
> did but it didnt start up it gave me an error.
> chown root.root /etc/init.d/firewall
> chmod u=rwx /etc/init.d /firewall
>
> And when i restart I GET ERROR... which is
> "iptables: execvp: Permission Denied
> rc. Starting iptables: Failed"
>
> I also have this line sh /etc/init.d/firewall at the
> end of my "rc.local" file
>
> HOW CAN I FIX THIS OR GET THEM TO START-UP PROPERLY?
> EDIT: > OOPPPPPPSS guys i forgot to mention the
> original iptables script that came installed already
> on my system in the "/etc/init.d/" i moved that to
> somewhere else.... was i suppose to do that or just
> leave them there???
>
>
>
> =====
>
> Image by MackDaddy
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-21 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-21 21:12 iptables: exe Tasha Smith
2002-09-21 21:28 ` Antony Stone
2002-09-21 22:11 ` Tasha Smith
2002-09-21 22:37 ` Stewart Thompson
2002-09-21 22:58 ` Tasha Smith
2002-09-21 23:13 ` Stewart Thompson [this message]
2002-09-21 22:58 ` Tasha Smith
2002-09-24 20:24 ` internal ftp/port forwarding problem skmail
[not found] <20020921220721.11083.qmail@web20303.mail.yahoo.com>
2002-09-21 22:19 ` iptables: exe Antony Stone
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-22 1:36 Tasha Smith
2002-09-22 1:57 ` Stewart Thompson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=FLEKIPPLAEDMJMOOBBDPKEGPCPAA.stewart.thompson@shaw.ca \
--to=stewart.thompson@shaw.ca \
--cc=natasha3641@yahoo.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox