Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Matthieu Turpault" <mt.netfilter@comelis.fr>
To: Cedric Blancher <blancher@cartel-securite.fr>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: ip_conntrack module, advanced routing and multiple ISP
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:13:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MGEFIJGLOCLFFKBKAFEPEEEJEHAA.mt.netfilter@comelis.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1063714990.887.101.camel@elendil.intranet.cartel-securite.net>

OK, thanks for all these answers.

I am sorry if my previous mail is too agressive: my english is not
sufficiently rich to transmit exactly what I feel. I have spent a lot of
time to this "FTP problem" and still have no answer. Grrr.... ;)

It *is* a routing problem. I think that the CONNMARK module could resolve it
but I had to patch my kernel to test it. When I will have time, I try to do
that.

Best regards

Matthieu Turpault

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Cedric Blancher [mailto:blancher@cartel-securite.fr]
> Envoyé : mardi 16 septembre 2003 14:23
> À : Matthieu Turpault
> Cc : netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> Objet : Re: ip_conntrack module, advanced routing and multiple ISP
>
>
> I do not have much time, but I'll give you my first thought about your
> problem.
>
> Le lun 15/09/2003 à 12:28, Matthieu Turpault a écrit :
> > 	The problem is that I can't connect from the internal network to
> > 	 a ftp server of the net. In fact, I can connect to a ftp server
> > 	 of the net but the "ls" command failed the most of the time (1/3).
> > 	 I use passive mode.
>
> I think command connection and data connection are not routed through
> the same ISP and thus are received by FTP server from 2 different IPs,
> which means data connection SYN is droped.
>
> This suppose you are load balancing using some round robbin like stuff,
> such as nth match (I really do not have time to examine your script
> now), and that 1/3 times data connection is set up with correct IP as
> source.
>
> >      If I add the route by the command
> > 	  ip route add <@ftpServer> via <@GATEWAY_ISP2>
> > 	  it is OK
>
> This tends to confirm the above. You should investigate this routing
> stuff.
>
>
> Btw, you should use CONNMARK target instead of MARK target to have your
> packets marked.
>
> cbr@elendil:~$ iptables -j CONNMARK --help
> iptables v1.2.8
> [...]
> CONNMARK target v1.2.8 options:
>   --set-mark value              Set conntrack mark value
>   --save-mark                   Save the packet nfmark on the connection
>   --restore-mark                Restore saved nfmark value
>
> The connmark is a mark you set for the whole connection. This means that
> once you've set a mark on a packet, every following packet identified by
> conntrack engine as belonging to the same connection (ESTABLISHED or
> RELATED) is marked with the same value. You also have corresponding
> match, connmark. With -save-mark and --restore-mark  you can switch
> between nfmark (MARK/mark target and match) and connmark. See :
>
> http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/pomlist/pom-extra.html#CONNMARK
>
> This mean you're sure that data connection is marked the same way as
> corresponding command connection, and thus is routed the same way.
>
> --
> http://www.netexit.com/~sid/
> PGP KeyID: 157E98EE FingerPrint: FA62226DA9E72FA8AECAA240008B480E157E98EE
>



  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-17  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-15 10:28 ip_conntrack module, advanced routing and multiple ISP Matthieu Turpault
2003-09-16 11:02 ` Matthieu Turpault
2003-09-16 11:25   ` Mickael DILY
2003-09-16 11:30   ` Roberto Nibali
2003-09-16 11:57   ` Ray Leach
2003-09-16 12:23 ` Cedric Blancher
2003-09-17  9:13   ` Matthieu Turpault [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-15  8:55 Matthieu Turpault

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MGEFIJGLOCLFFKBKAFEPEEEJEHAA.mt.netfilter@comelis.fr \
    --to=mt.netfilter@comelis.fr \
    --cc=blancher@cartel-securite.fr \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox