Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
To: Michael Klinteberg <micke@klintan.se>
Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Please explain the limit match
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 16:51:43 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402011643020.25106@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002101c3e908$0eb37d00$c800a8c0@klintan.cjb.net>



On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Michael Klinteberg wrote:

> I have read the man page over and over again for the iptables limit
> match. Don't quite understad the --limit and --limit-burst.
> 
> Can anyone please give me some easy LOGing examples with diffrent
> time-intervalls.

  i remember, once upon a time, trying to figure this out and becoming
hopelessly confused by an overly-complicated explanation.  once i
discarded the verbiage, it seemed quite simple.

  think of starting with a collection of tokens that you use to pay
for packets.  if packets come in quickly, you'll quickly run out of 
tokens, and on a *regular* basis, you're given a token to replenish
your supply.

  as an example, let's say you define a limit of 5/sec, and a limit
burst of 10.  this means (and please correct me if i'm wrong), you start
with 10 tokens, and that's the *maximum* you'll ever be allowed to hold.

  every time a packet comes in that matches your criteria, if you want to
accept it, you have to pay a token.  based on your limit, you'll be 
replenished at the rate of 5/sec, or one every 0.2 seconds.

  if you get no packets, you'll just sit there, hoarding your 10 tokens.
if, suddenly, you get a flurry of activity (DoS attack), you'll spend your
10 tokens almost immediately, and then will have to reject further 
packets, except that every 0.2 seconds, you'll get another token, which
you'll spend immediately as long as you have heavy incoming traffic.

  only when the traffic dies off will you get a breather and a chance to
replenish your supply of tokens again, one every 0.2 seconds in your case.
i did, in fact, test this with logging and it matches what i described 
here.  others use an analogy of balls in a bucket, etc.

rday



  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-02-01 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-01 21:12 Please explain the limit match Michael Klinteberg
2004-02-01 21:28 ` Alexis
2004-02-02  2:11   ` Michael Klinteberg
2004-02-01 21:51 ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2004-02-02  2:09   ` Michael Klinteberg
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-01 20:46 Michael Klinteberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0402011643020.25106@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rpjday@mindspring.com \
    --cc=micke@klintan.se \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox