From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "R. DuFresne" Subject: Re: RST packets Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:39:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Netfilter User Mailing List -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > Hi, > > > a simple question, though I could not clearly read it from the TCP RFC... > do RST packets always have ACK set? > > Past discussions on this, if I recall have stated, that the RFC is unclear if they should or should not, and thus it is implimentation specific. In other words prepare for both. Thanks, Ron DuFresne - -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ admin & senior security consultant: sysinfo.com http://sysinfo.com Key fingerprint = 9401 4B13 B918 164C 647A E838 B2DF AFCC 94B0 6629 ...We waste time looking for the perfect lover instead of creating the perfect love. -Tom Robbins -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC29s0st+vzJSwZikRAhFhAJ9VrBg8udgLE/rjWj69PZI+xj/J1QCg21bk Nv2IJV8hI5/AhxnInjSMq5Y= =OiGE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----