From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A0A914B092 for ; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 22:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739139840; cv=none; b=amQwu+h/OY6T8mmZ1LB25sm4Q7tIz5C++D3bS7nNZmb+NxqJPZt799b7JoqxmTGcHK7Odft5BQRmj2As4FwjDcGgMeSz3KKN77iLAWzDGOB9GmxB1XJs2MK3sa0B1fa48sjR6mb4HDp0V6OMnDOR2ov8/0of2wlehVhg1t1jxxE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739139840; c=relaxed/simple; bh=n1QGFnsbZdybnWu+GQe0JR6tW8M6FfLOUjc+oi38TUs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GtpOpigvtz8N5rFAIjytqp9wQLDxt513iKK6nR+WnGJmJkqvzL8ME5TNDcqndO7HsvinLhl2gyfUR0w0ifGL8Kayh1BygwOEVrmYYMZLJlgoxGcQvhKmro0CS6Glb1SXhd4bKgVtM9TY1OAvBGeyiYR1jH36T4WkNKUINoDeRFI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=kefojdqx; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=kefojdqx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="kefojdqx"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="kefojdqx" Received: by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix, from userid 109) id A24636034D; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 23:23:47 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1739139827; bh=mQZwCIWBQgnqn50aPPhOzq8nQxjnUZwFsN+aoOiElGU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kefojdqxhOzq0wapkScmHUABF/SBAArHwMorHnN7UH+naarCNX5/HVJiebHGWkVEF N1zpfpcQgyYxdkx1TGQe+oFmxLe4EsM0CTGxPE75H52UuE9+d6WPQmvCb4XslZg3+u 6V3O8Q+xDDND1YK3QomwC93CH4OROj2DJIE5Ixd2s9H6IUZb/7bK+C/4VcXAYVL8qJ A7oerp14vEnBGdY8nN61qB5/V1yvIN/tfQcoKPRo+bFWkRWxj2DtRYR/QB4TU6MLSN qF9820QyFcwSFoz0Oexfk5dAFkBGPOs8/7MxfQMzYfFmumir6C3qQ9Ub0iisCDgeJ4 1J9aWwBurJcDg== X-Spam-Level: Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1397360305; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 23:23:47 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1739139827; bh=mQZwCIWBQgnqn50aPPhOzq8nQxjnUZwFsN+aoOiElGU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kefojdqxhOzq0wapkScmHUABF/SBAArHwMorHnN7UH+naarCNX5/HVJiebHGWkVEF N1zpfpcQgyYxdkx1TGQe+oFmxLe4EsM0CTGxPE75H52UuE9+d6WPQmvCb4XslZg3+u 6V3O8Q+xDDND1YK3QomwC93CH4OROj2DJIE5Ixd2s9H6IUZb/7bK+C/4VcXAYVL8qJ A7oerp14vEnBGdY8nN61qB5/V1yvIN/tfQcoKPRo+bFWkRWxj2DtRYR/QB4TU6MLSN qF9820QyFcwSFoz0Oexfk5dAFkBGPOs8/7MxfQMzYfFmumir6C3qQ9Ub0iisCDgeJ4 1J9aWwBurJcDg== Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2025 23:23:44 +0100 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Sunny73Cr Cc: Florian Westphal , "netfilter@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Raw Payload Expressions - out of bounds write? Message-ID: References: <20250126135021.GB3073@breakpoint.cc> <20250128003706.GB29891@breakpoint.cc> <20250209014753.GA1766@breakpoint.cc> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 03:12:48AM +0000, Sunny73Cr wrote: > Hi, > > Still confusing, my bad. Here's what I'm looking for. > > Input: > @ih,56,6 set 0 ^ this is in bits. > Expected output: > [ payload load 1 byte @ inner header + 6 bytes => reg 1 ] > [ bitwise reg 1 = ( reg 1 & 0xc0 ) ] > [ payload write reg 1 => 1 byte @ inner header + 6 bytes ... ] and you use 6 bytes in this bytecode. This makes no sense at all.