From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: "U.Mutlu" <um@mutluit.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [nftables/nft] nft equivalent of "ipset test"
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 11:23:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZS+j+fCU9vehzJqY@calendula> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <652F0C75.8010006@mutluit.com>
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 12:36:37AM +0200, U.Mutlu wrote:
> Florian Westphal wrote on 10/18/23 00:05:
> > U.Mutlu <um@mutluit.com> wrote:
> > > Florian Westphal wrote on 10/17/23 23:35:
> > > > U.Mutlu <um@mutluit.com> wrote:
> > > > > The "ipset" commandline tool has the "test" command
> > > > > for testing whether a given item (ie. an IP) is in a given set.
> > > > > Is there an equivalent for the "nft" commandline tool of nftables?
> > > > > I unfortunately couldn't find the answer in the manpage of nft.
> > > >
> > > > nft "get element inet tablename setname { 1.2.3.4 }"
> > >
> > > But isn't that printing the whole item on stdout?
> > > I just need to quickly test it only,
> > > ie. need just a return code of 0 or 1, or so,
> > > for use in a shell script (bash).
> >
> > ?
> >
> > nft "get element inet t s { 1.2.3.4 }" > /dev/null 2>&1; echo $?
> > 1
> > nft "add element inet t s { 1.2.3.4 }"
> > nft "get element inet t s { 1.2.3.4 }" > /dev/null 2>&1; echo $?
> > 0
>
> Actualy I need to do this monster: :-)
>
> IP="1.2.3.4"
> ! nft "get element inet mytable myset { $IP }" > /dev/null 2>&1 && \
> ! nft "get element inet mytable myset2 { $IP }" > /dev/null 2>&1 && \
> nft "add element inet mytable myset { $IP }"
Use 'nft create element' if you want to fail if element already
exists.
> Ie. add it to the set myset only if it's not already present in any of myset
> and myset2.
>
> A true "test" command w/o any output, much like in "ipset test", would be a
> better method, IMO.
>
> I've not switched yet to nftables, just (dry-) evaluating it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-18 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-17 17:11 [nftables/nft] nft equivalent of "ipset test" U.Mutlu
2023-10-17 21:35 ` Florian Westphal
2023-10-17 21:55 ` U.Mutlu
2023-10-17 22:05 ` Florian Westphal
2023-10-17 22:36 ` U.Mutlu
2023-10-18 9:23 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
[not found] ` <20231017200057.57cfce21@playground>
2023-10-18 9:36 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-18 9:54 ` U.Mutlu
2023-10-18 10:00 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-18 11:07 ` U.Mutlu
2023-10-18 11:49 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-10-18 13:03 ` U.Mutlu
2023-10-18 14:37 ` Phil Sutter
2023-10-18 11:54 ` Kerin Millar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZS+j+fCU9vehzJqY@calendula \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=um@mutluit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox