From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Antonio Ojea <antonio.ojea.garcia@gmail.com>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Confirming conntrack behavior on environments with multiple network namespaces
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 16:03:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aNadJ2EiPn6pMQ1E@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABhP=ta4Rxf-TUa9YU2dAM5zgpkL7sqNHaTSAiHDR_5cXh1hTA@mail.gmail.com>
Antonio Ojea <antonio.ojea.garcia@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Or add 'notrack' rules in init_net for the netns originating traffic.
> > Or create a netns, enable conntrack and then only create connections
> > to addresses reachable via loopback. In all these cases init_net won't
> > be affected by the net namespace.
>
> It will be hard to disable conntrack in init_net, a lot of
> functionality relies on NAT in kubernetes and is not owned by the same
> component
Sure, I understand that no-conntrack-in-init-but-in-another-namespace
is atypical.
> > That will only monitor that namespace, I'm not aware of a global counter.
> >
>
> Can this be a feature request? having a global counter can easily
> monitor the load factor of the system, but I'm not familiar with
> kernel conventions and having some global counter may be discouraged
Not sure we should add one, it will result in some overhead for no good
reason. Maybe /proc/slabinfo is enough for your use case?
nf_conntrack has its own (global) memory pool, it should provide a
reasonably good estimate across all netns.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-26 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-22 9:38 Confirming conntrack behavior on environments with multiple network namespaces Antonio Ojea
2025-09-23 17:07 ` Florian Westphal
2025-09-26 13:10 ` Antonio Ojea
2025-09-26 14:03 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2025-09-26 14:41 ` Antonio Ojea
2025-09-30 19:13 ` Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aNadJ2EiPn6pMQ1E@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=antonio.ojea.garcia@gmail.com \
--cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox