Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: js yu <junsang.yu3@gmail.com>
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question about security table priority in iptables-nft
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 15:33:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aq6PFTId2rPkprln@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGh5W5g+7LiEyR+bJ_aq=8mtRkgQuebkDMT1zq7TJ4j0xxY8DA@mail.gmail.com>

js yu <junsang.yu3@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> In iptables/nft.c (v1.8.13), the built-in security chains use:
> 
> .prio = 150, /* NF_IP_PRI_SECURITY */
> 
> However, NF_IP_PRI_SECURITY is defined as 50 in the kernel,
> and iptables-legacy uses that value for its security table.

Yes, looks like a bug.  I pushed a change to correct this, thanks
for reporting.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-19 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-19 12:42 Question about security table priority in iptables-nft js yu
2026-09-19 13:33 ` Florian Westphal [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aq6PFTId2rPkprln@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=junsang.yu3@gmail.com \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox