From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ratheesh k Subject: netfilter queue Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:45:19 +0530 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=dHc3OqDXfcExo2idTDdAnp9NK5/A/T2CtdL2JeyUFJM=; b=WWgOhIDcF4aVkH6QZPJArEFVUa84nyZYymcNXa6fpG6cRpcUBEqMy45Vr+XtNrZXf6 47cGv3lY0giiXjQKUZVyf7euXjQhaO+pn3ozVPHeeOTE4SaB8C+oVx0//XlRIRue+MnW y1S9SfJ7rUuf8xzzV/AJ4flK8EywPqdGqZac8= Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter@vger.kernel.org Hi all , xt_time module is not handling DST . So i am writing a userspace application to handle time based pkt filtering by queuing pkts to userspace using NFQUEUE target . There are some concerns and doubts 1 ) All packets will be copied to userspace , one pkt at a time , based on the iptables rule . But , if i use any system call in my user space application before reinjecting the pkt back to kernel , will it severely dampen the network throughput ? 2) Creating /proc entries and passing DST values to kernel and Handle Time by xt_time module will be a better solution ? Thanks, Ratheesh